New(?) Sorting Problem

Martin Marques martin at
Thu Aug 3 02:50:30 CEST 2006

On Tue, 1 Aug 2006 11:07:00 -0600, Eric Stadtherr <estadtherr at> wrote:
> 	I am partially responsible for the sorting "fixes" of late, so
> I'd like to take part in the resolution of this one. Rev288
> contains a fix I made to the code that manages the results of the
> server-side sorting Although the fix is working, it seems that it
> negatively impacted the behavior in the absence of "SORT" capability
> on the IMAP server.
> 	I believe the behavior before my fix was to simply display the
> messages in IMAP Message Sequence Number order (basically the order
> the messages arrived in the folder). I think I can come up with an
> easy patch to restore this behavior when "SORT" capability is absent.
> How does that sound? 

For me date order and arravial order are two different ways of sorting messages.

Lic. Martín Marqués         |   SELECT 'mmarques' || 
Centro de Telemática        |       '@' || '';
Universidad Nacional        |   DBA, Programador, 
    del Litoral             |   Administrador

More information about the Dev mailing list