Wrong sorting - please help me debug this

Thomas Bruederli roundcube at gmail.com
Fri Jul 28 12:16:55 CEST 2006

Hi Eric,

I absolutely agree with your suggestion. Your sorting class seems to
do a better job than iil_SortHeaders does. Unfortunately I didn't read
your patch first and just looked for my faults because sorting once
worked in RoundCube. I will add your patch to the Trunk and replace
the old sorting behavior.

Thanks a lot!

2006/7/26, Eric Stadtherr <estadtherr at gmail.com>:
- Zitierten Text ausblenden -
> Thomas,
> That's essentially what I did in my fix - use the sequence returned by the
> IMAP SORT command to re-order the list returned by the FETCH command.
> The only problem with using iil_SortHeaders to sort the fetched list is that
> it implements its own sorting algorithm, ignoring the sequence returned by
> the SORT command. The algorithm probably produces the same results, but why
> tell the IMAP server to sort the list and then throw away the results? I
> think we need to choose one or the other - tell the IMAP server to sort the
> list, or execute our own sorting algorithm. I vote for letting the IMAP
> server do the sort - this automatically gives us support for any future IMAP
> sorting behavior without having to maintain our own algorithms.
>  Thoughts?

More information about the Dev mailing list