[RCD] [RCU] RoundCube Calendar

Andre Rodier andre.rodier at gmail.com
Sun Mar 10 22:17:12 CET 2013


Does this code is actually accessible somewhere, as I would like to participate.

I have a caldav server (davical), and I should be able to test it.

My page on github: https://github.com/arodier/Roundcube-Plugins,
where I have developed three small plugins useful for enterprises.

Kind regards,

On Friday, 22.02.13 at 13:14, Chris Moules wrote:
> On 14/02/13 10:00, Thomas Bruederli wrote:
> > Nieścierowicz Adam wrote:
> >> So when looking through google, I found resources on the stand AGPL license
> >> client thought that maybe someone is willing to finish on AGPL license.
> > 
> > The calendar module provided by Kolab is under APGL but currently lacks a
> > CalDAV backend. There are plans to add this but the work for that isn't
> > scheduled yet.
> >>
> >> Personally, I am ready to sponsor a programmer, maybe others willing to help?
> > 
> > I could connect you with the programmers who announced their intents to add
> > CalDAV to the Kolab calendar module. Or maybe they're even listening on
> > this list (therefore cc-ing the dev list).
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Thomas
> Hello,
> we at GMS (http://www.gms.lu/ - https://github.com/GMS-SA/)are the
> company Thomas hinted at who are working on CalDAV and CardDAV support.
> The Calendar support is implemented by extending the Kolab plugin(s). A
> CalDAV driver is being implemented for calendar and tasklist plugins.
> The CardDAV support is being implemented as a new and independent plugin
> as the Kolab addressbook is completely different and does not support
> backend 'drivers'.
> Our CalDAV implementation is using the SabreDAV
> (http://code.google.com/p/sabredav/) and the sabre-vobject
> (https://github.com/evert/sabre-vobject) Libraries.
> In both cases our target CalDAV/CardDAV server is SOGo
> (http://www.sogo.nu/). Development is trying to stay as RFC complaint as
> possible. There are cases, however, where SOGo diverges from the RFC or
> the RFCs were published later than features were implemented in SOGo. In
> such cases it is planned to have config options for server support so
> that this does not become a SOGo plugin. Our main focus is SOGo as this
> is what we are using.
> Work is well underway. Most functionality is implemented but there is
> still lots to do before a release is expected. We are not talking years
> but probably over 1 month.
> Regards,
> Chris
> P.S.
> Thomas, if you wish to re-post this to the 'users' list, to which I am
> not subscribed, please feel free.
> _______________________________________________
> Roundcube Development discussion mailing list
> dev at lists.roundcube.net
> http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/dev

More information about the dev mailing list