On 11/18/2012 11:13 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote:
Yes. This is by design. If you view the message as HTML we use the same part for response. It's because text and html part may differ.
Well, they HAVE to differ by definition, IMO. Otherwise it wouldn't make sense to have a text/html and a text/plain part, if there would be nil difference.
But the text part of a HTML message is by far the better formatted and "quotable" part than the HTML part, being stripped and re-formatted by Roundcube or any other MUA. See the newsletter that I attached to my original post, the quote is just ridiculous.
I do not agree. I think it's better to quote on reply the same content we see when previewing the message. So, if we preview in HTML we use html part, if in text we use text part. I saw many messages that had totally different text part or even empty (but existing).
If someone create a patch which implements an option to change this behaviour via user preferences, we would likely accept it, however.