1 May
2012
1 May
'12
11:58 a.m.
On 05/01/2012 01:55 PM, A.L.E.C wrote:
I'm not sure if this would run less frequently. It actually has to run with the minimum interval of all recurring checks which need to be done.
The "global action" will be run probably with current interval, but the new keep-alive action will be run less frequently because it would depend only on session_lifetime.
... and its execution will be postponed on any user (or our global recurring) action.
--
Aleksander 'A.L.E.C' Machniak
LAN Management System Developer [http://lms.org.pl]
Roundcube Webmail Developer [http://roundcube.net]
---------------------------------------------------
PGP: 19359DC1 @@ GG: 2275252 @@ WWW: http://alec.pl