Hello,
Am 22.03.2013 11:13, schrieb A.L.E.C:
You can check the behavior by clicking Reply All button (not Reply List) on this message. Example message from our mailing list contains headers: To: dev@lists.roundcube.net Reply-To: dev@lists.roundcube.net From: original@poster.tld
So, current behavior is that you end up with one recipient dev@lists.roundcube.net in To field. Thunderbird for example, will add original@poster.tld in Cc field.
So, the problem is related to Reply-To header handling. Poll:
- Keep current behavior.
- If To: and Reply-To: are the same and From: is different - add From:
address to Cc field.
I prefer current solution (1). Because I think that if Reply-To is defined a senders intention is to not receive replies to his From: address, no matter if Reply, Reply-All or Reply-List is used. I however understand that "private reply" to poster is sometimes wanted.
With solution 1, Reply-To and Reply-All do the same for the described scenario, right? Honestly, I don't think this is a good idea. Reply-All should do what its name suggests: reply to all (except my own address).
In my opinion, user mistakes like using Reply-All instead of Reply-To misleadingly are still user mistakes, and shouldn't be covered up by the MUA.
Kind regards, jonas