On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:14:08 +0100, Thomas Bruederli roundcube@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tobias,
All you described is a must-have for RoundCube and we're are working on a new wiki-based website which will provide the basic functionality to publish all these information. The more painful part will be to write all the docs but I guess we already have a lot of texts from the mailing list and from other sites describing the installation of RoundCube. I hope that we can come up with this soon but time is rare at the moment.
Thomas Once the Wiki is up we'll (us on the list and RC users) will flesh out a framework for the docs, and then fill in the blanks. Ideally users would be better at the docs since they're coming at it from a user perspective, whereas you should keep on coding ;) and look over our docs for completeness. I hear ya on the free time, but thank you for what you've done for us. Now it's time for us to give back. Also I've used Trac on the Typo project, and it's a nice wiki/bug reporting app...I like it.
So, let me/us know if we can help in any way.
P
Regards, Thomas
Tobias Witek wrote:
hi everyone,
it seems that documentation (both for the user and for the developer) is rather small (no wonder, regarding the youth of roundcube, right now features are more important, i think).
may i suggest the introduction of a wiki for roundcube-related issues?
i'm thinking about it as something where developers can a) describe their modules b) agree on a coding convention (very important, in my opinion) c) sketch an overall frame of how roundcube's pieces fit and act together d) get a quick introduction into installing it (with configs "known to work" and ones that cause problems and how to circumvent them) e) ? f) profit!
and users can a) get some initial info on how to use roundcube b) browse FAQs
any comments?
best regards,
t