On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 03:26:16 -0700, chris# chris#@codewarehouse.NET wrote:
Oh. I quite agree that MDB2 is more robust - no doubt about it. I would also assert that many are of the philosophy that "if it ain't broke, don't fix it". Which will greatly account for those that are still using DB. There is still a possible issue with MDB2 regarding file reads (attachments). While this may be a "border case". Until the source of the issue has been _conclusively_ determined (which may in fact turn out to be an MDB2 version) DB should (must?) remain. No?
I just noticed that ALEC checked in a change that removed DB yesterday. Did Chris' concerns above get addressed, or is there still a chance that there's a problem with attachments and MDB2?
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/