Call me old fashioned, but for me I prefer Media Wiki: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki
It has a clearly defined informational structure, which personally I feel is more easy to understand.
I think this thread though highlights the fundamental problem with ANY wiki, we all have different comfort levels and understand structure in different ways. There's nothing wrong with a lose structure, but some people (like me) find it confusing. However, other people, find highly structured sites constricting and a pain to manage.
Which camp is right? We are all. :)
I'd say this was my 2 pence, but I just noticed GBP has dropped slightly against the yen so my opinion is now literally worth nothing.
Geoffrey
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 15:35:37 +0200, Ale Muñoz ale@bomberstudios.com wrote:
On 10/10/2005, at 14:37, Geoffrey McCaleb wrote:
The lack of structure is clearly a problem on that wiki.
Take a look at CakePHP's wiki: https://trac.cakephp.org/ You can define a custom navigation in Trac. Should you need something more structured, I'd suggest you all to take a look at Hieraki: http://www.hieraki.org They have a demo working at http://demo.hieraki.org/frontpage/index Hope it helps. Ale Muñoz P.S: Maybe it is just my mailer, but shouldn't the Reply-to: header be set by the mailing list to dev@lists.roundcube.net? I can'treply to posts by hitting "Reply"...