Am 22.11.2013 10:47, schrieb Thomas Bruederli:
A.L.E.C wrote:
On 11/22/2013 09:52 AM, Thomas Bruederli wrote:
I don't agree. Colored text on dark background is less readable than black on white. The larger font is supposed to compensate that which it IMO does.
I do not think the text is less readable, but if so maybe make it more brighter.
Making them brighter will result in pastel colors which I don't really consider adorable. But that's probably a matter of personal taste.
And what are "some small improvements"?
well, I'd like to move container few pixels to the left (so right border is not above other element border)
Done.
and move info icon a few pixels down (it's not aligned with text).
Done.
I'd also consider smaller (not much) opacity value.
I'm using the opacity value from your jsfiddle ;-) By smaller you mean less opaque and more transparent? That would again reduce readability...
28 messages already about colors, pixels, opacity, transparency, brightness, font size - I'd wish I'd have your problems... (in German: "Eure Probleme möchte ich haben...").
Is anyone still open to a discussion about the more technical side of things? E.g. indicating attachments in the message list of multipart/alternative messages with a nested multipart/mixed part? Or "least invasive" charset declarations (e.g. declaring "US-ASCII" or "ISO-8859-1" rather than "UTF-8" if "US-ASCII" or "ISO-8859-1" would be "just enough" - and yes, I know that "UTF-8" is always correct)?
Cheers and <sigh>,
Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany