Am 02.02.2013 13:10, schrieb A.L.E.C:
On 02/02/2013 12:34 AM, Michael Heydekamp wrote:
Unlike to Cc and Bcc, where I can manually add any other addresses while the ones entered in the identity are being preserved, any address added to the Reply-To field is not really "additional": It does overwrite the ones defined in the identity.
Indeed, open a ticket.
Sure, will do later on. (Did really nobody notice that before...?)
The other part of your message is already requested in http://trac.roundcube.net/ticket/1486200.
Yes, for 3 years already. And much to my surprise, it's not even considered as a bug.
But indeed it IS a bug: In the meantime I also encountered that upon saving the message as a draft and continue composing it later on, the following happens:
- The BCC addresses being entered in the identity are still NOT shown in
the respective address field within Roundcube. BUT:
- The Reply-To addresses being entered in the identity ARE all of a sudden
shown in the respective address field within Roundcube.
This different treatment of "Bcc" and "Reply-To" entries in identities can not be meant as being "by design". If so, the design is wrong, IMO.
But this different treatment can at least be used as a workaround: Save the message as draft, close it, edit it again, and THEN you can really add a Reply-To address (by preserving the ones being entered in the identity).
A bit strange, or not...?
Cheers,
Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany