On Tue, 1 Aug 2006 11:07:00 -0600, Eric Stadtherr estadtherr@gmail.com wrote:
I am partially responsible for the sorting "fixes" of late, so I'd like to take part in the resolution of this one. Rev288 contains a fix I made to the code that manages the results of the server-side sorting Although the fix is working, it seems that it negatively impacted the behavior in the absence of "SORT" capability on the IMAP server.
I believe the behavior before my fix was to simply display the messages in IMAP Message Sequence Number order (basically the order the messages arrived in the folder). I think I can come up with an easy patch to restore this behavior when "SORT" capability is absent. How does that sound?
For me date order and arravial order are two different ways of sorting messages.
--
Lic. Martín Marqués | SELECT 'mmarques' || Centro de Telemática | '@' || 'unl.edu.ar'; Universidad Nacional | DBA, Programador, del Litoral | Administrador