On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 6:26 AM, chris# chris#@codewarehouse.net wrote:
Oh. I quite agree that MDB2 is more robust - no doubt about it. I would also assert that many are of the philosophy that "if it ain't broke, don't fix it". Which will greatly account for those that are still using DB. There is still a possible issue with MDB2 regarding file reads (attachments). While this may be a "border case". Until the source of the issue has been _conclusively_ determined (which may in fact turn out to be an MDB2 version) DB should (must?) remain. No?
Chris,
I still don't understand which issue it is, so can you please point out if an issue has been reported, or not? If it has not been reported, please open a ticket and include steps to reproduce it (e.g. sample email) so we can fix it right away?
Thanks, Till _______________________________________________ List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/