On 09/18/2013 03:23 PM, David Deutsch wrote:
Credibility? Eternalize? What? Look - I'm just a FOSS coder and I don't care how "professional" or whatever I come across.
Well, we do not care either, but we care about us and our project.
What I do care about is an /honest/ track record that can be seen in my github profile, amongst other things.
Well, you have your repository with commits history, right?
More importantly though, I consider the price you would have to pay smaller than the one I'm paying.
So, we do not agree on that.
Anyways, I'm getting a sense that this is really mostly about commit /messages/. Well alright then. What about if I simply rename those commits? Would be a bit of rebasing, but from my count, there's only about 15 commits that lack a good commit message. Would that be an agreeable compromise?
And add "Code style fixes: " prefix to all of them... But still I think the number of commits in PR#109 is not acceptable.