Jon Daley wrote:
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, B. Johannessen wrote:
Messages with a Reply-To: header field already present will not have it replaced.
Given the starred portion below, should I assume that people who are explicitly setting the reply-to field (particularly when they set it to the content of the from field, rather than something else) actually want to get direct mail?
Yes! Reply-To is optional and controlled by the author. In essence it's the author saying "If you reply to this message, please send your reply to this address". This is one reason I think it's a bad idea to add a Reply-To header fields to list messages, and a *REALLY* bad idea to replace Reply-To in such messages.
As en example, I've set Reply-To: bob@db.org for this message, as this has nothing to do with RoundCube development, and if I am to continue this discussion I'd rather do it off list.
Bob