On Tue, 4 Jul 2006 15:55:40 +0200, Erik erik@prikbord.org wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006 10:34:15 -0300, Martin Marques martin@bugs.unl.edu.ar wrote:
Yes, you are right, but as someone pointed out earlier today, things get done faster when they are sent to the mailling list, contrary of just adding a ticket. I had 2 tickets with patches that fixed the problem,
and
one of them got commit (thanks rich on that) after I asked on this list why it wasn't commit yet. Other things get done fast from the tickets.
These are two different things:
- report problem
- provide patch through mailing list and ask if it can be applied
And my opinion is that 2 cannot be done without 1, and then why not use tickets, as that is want they are ment for. And I prefer tickets as this provides some sort of documentation. Also to new users. For example, feature request which have been added and discussed on mailing list and then denied, don't get requested for a second time. These discussions and decisions then also have to be added to the wiki and documentation, so that it is clear to everyone what is being done and when (or why not).
My patches were attached to the ticket. I asked the list why they weren't commit, but patches were in the ticket. :-D
--
Lic. Martín Marqués | SELECT 'mmarques' || Centro de Telemática | '@' || 'unl.edu.ar'; Universidad Nacional | DBA, Programador, del Litoral | Administrador