> Having it again here cannot benefit the Roundcube project in any way.In the end, there are a lot of pros and cons for various ways of doing things. The important thing is making decisions while remaining open to change. We have come to a decision and that's what counts right now.
Indeed, I hope I did not make the impression that I wanted to have the basic style discussion that has turned many mailing lists first into hot pits of hell and then tumbleweeds. I was just trying to find a consensus to build on and got a bit carried away trying to influence the decisionmaking ;-)On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net> wrote:
Am 11.09.2013 20:16, schrieb Rob Sheldon:
> On 2013-09-11 11:06, Reindl Harald wrote:maybe you answered to a different thread / topic as i did............
>>
>> what i personally *never* understood is why the whole world is writing
>> one of both unreadable code-styles at all
>>
>> ...
>
> This is a 40-year-old debate over style. Having it again here cannot benefit the Roundcube project in any way
_______________________________________________
Roundcube Development discussion mailing list
dev@lists.roundcube.net
http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/dev