Missed a bit the latest RC developments, due to other tasks that I had to follow during the last wekks/months. But just now I realize that we finally have a Text/HTML toggle at the very right of the display of the subject header line. Just great, thanks to all who have contributed to this!
Of course I tested it instantly, and found the following:
- It seems to be stored somewhere which part had lastly been viewed for a
particular message, am I seeing this correct...? And if so, how and where is this (safely) being stored? I'm wondering if RC shouldn't first and always display the part according to the setting "Display HTML" under "Displaying Messages" after selecting back and forth between messages (would look more consistent to me)?
- Toggling between Text and HTML part seems to work flawlessly (using the
icon at the right of the subject header).
- But: Viewing the Text part, there is still the well-known link "HTML
message" below the header. Viewing the HTML part, opposed to this there is (still) no correspondent link "Text message" below the header. Anyway, the still existing link "HTML message" is sort of redundant to the toggle at the right of the subject header. This should be more consistent (either showing an additional link below the header always or never, no matter which part is being viewed).
I would prefer a link below the header ONLY anyway (as the icon at the right of the subject header is hard to detect and the text "HTML message" or "Text message" is more user-friendly, better visible and better understandable than those - pretty small - icons). Alternatively, both toggles should exist. The least solution from my point of view would be to have JUST these icons.
- There is a problem when I'm viewing the Text part and click on the above
mentioned and still existing link "HTML message" below the header: The HTML part is being displayed, but the display of the header disappears entirely (see screenshot comparison attached).
- At a first quick test, it seems that a reply does quote the part which
is currently being viewed. Is this correct and intentional? If so: Great!
Cheers,
Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany
