47E8FA36.3030606@alec.pl 47E956D5.2010208@dragonboricua.net Message-ID: fd0dcc3f0cede465e12aca8b694eba02@unstable.nl X-Sender: andreas@unstable.nl Received: from vpn-144-20.vpn.uva.nl [146.50.144.20] with HTTP/1.1 (POST); Tue, 25 Mar 2008 21:34:32 +0100 User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.1-rc1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:47:33 -0400, Elisamuel Resto samuel@dragonboricua.net wrote:
I remember talking about this with Jason when the lists changed administrators, he pointed out a few things, amongst them: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Note that most "considered harmful" articles are rather tongue-in-cheek in nature.
More seriously, even Roundcube doesn't include such a button to reply to the mailinglist, so not having a reply-to header means that a lot of people have to manually check that mails go to the correct address. Reply-all generates lots of double copies.
I suggest that for pragmatic reasons the reply-to header should be set.