Am 22.03.2013 19:38, schrieb A.L.E.C:
On 03/22/2013 07:13 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote:
I wasn't sure what the term "related images" exactly means. Attached images is clear to me, but what's the difference to related images?
Images used inside HTML code referred by attachment Content-Id. It might be <img src="cid:1234">. Such images are a message parts inside multipart/related structure of the message. Sometimes such attachments do not have a reference in HTML body, I call them unreferred.
related, referred, unreferred ... I must admit that I'm not too familiar with this complex HTML stuff in connection with multipart/related messages. What's the (technical) difference, if an image is referred to in a HTML body or not?
For now, I share the position of Sébastien BLAISOT:
Those images should be accessible for download in HTML and text mode, no matter if referred or unreferred (unless there is a sound technical reason for it, which I'm not aware of).
So I'd still vote for 3. (still not being sure of all of its implications).
Cheers,
Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany