So you're saying a clean commit history is more important than giving me proper credit where it is due? Again, that is not acceptable. Besides - why is the commit history that important to begin with?


On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:06 PM, A.L.E.C <alec@alec.pl> wrote:
On 09/18/2013 11:47 AM, David Deutsch wrote:
> As for the "last thing" - Yeah that's not acceptable to me. Erasing the
> history of how I did my work obfuscates my contribution and I would find
> that rather insulting. I'm happy to contribute and I'm happy to bend my
> contribution to your specifications. But come on, man, don't mess with the
> karma aspect of it.

Come on. The first PR has ca. 60 commits. This will make commit history
fucked up seriously. I will not merge such PR. I expect other code-style
PRs to have 10-20 commits, this is still too much.

--
Aleksander 'A.L.E.C' Machniak
LAN Management System Developer [http://lms.org.pl]
Roundcube Webmail Developer  [http://roundcube.net]
---------------------------------------------------
PGP: 19359DC1 @@ GG: 2275252 @@ WWW: http://alec.pl
_______________________________________________
Roundcube Development discussion mailing list
dev@lists.roundcube.net
http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/dev