Am 19.11.2012 20:41, schrieb Michael Heydekamp:
(and which part of the message will be quoted). At least I should have the chance to VIEW the text/plain part, even if "Display HTML" is enabled. I do not have a final concept at hand, but would you agree that some redesign is needed here...?
Uh again - this quote does have just one "> " at the beginning of the paragraph, the rest of the paragraph is "flowed" (unlike to the quote of the first paragraph of your message above). This is confusing me.
We'll see how that will be looking if I'm now gonna send this mail (with our default 'format_flowed = false')...
Well, it looks OK in Roundcube insofar as the entire paragraph is displayed as a quoted paragraph in flowed style, see attached image.
But this is a HTML-based and format_flowed-aware display, most text based MUAs would likely display it this way:
(and which part of the message will be quoted). At least I should have the
chance to VIEW the text/plain part, even if "Display HTML" is enabled. I do not have a final concept at hand, but would you agree that some redesign is needed here...?
Apart from that, we have two open questions in this respect:
- Why is especially this paragraph of the original message quoted in
flowed style upon replying, but all others are not (although they are identically formatted in the original message)?
- Why is 'format_flowed = false' apparently ignored upon sending?
But even more important is this issue, of course:
b) Vice versa ("Display HTML" being enabled)
th regards to if I will reply with a HTML or a plain text message [...]
Uh, what's this now...?!!
The quote above is missing a lot of text between "[...] being enabled)" and "th regards to [...]" The missing text is:
" I do NOT get a link to display the text/plain part. But if this link would exist, THIS could do the trick wi" This text can be seen in your reply, but it's gone in my quote of your reply.
Where the heck did this text go to? This is scaring me...
Regards,
Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany
