not sure why this is said but it suggests to me that you must combine all 'message-ID: ' fields into a single 'In-Reply-To: ' field as such:
message-ID: a@b.c message-ID: b@b.c
becomes:
In-Reply-To: a@b.c, b@b.c
the RFC leaves out whether it should be a comma-separated list or not.
Ok but :
Field Min number Max number Notes
message-id 0* 1 SHOULD be present - see 3.6.4
So I still dont understand...
Message sent to my personal address :
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 19:09:28 +0100, "dc.ml@oxys.net" dc.ml@oxys.net wrote:
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
If there is more than one parent message, then the "In- Reply-To:" field will contain the contents of all of the parents' "Message-ID:" fields.
?????????????? I don't understand this part
????????????????????????????????
not sure why this is said but it suggests to me that you must combine all 'message-ID: ' fields into a single 'In-Reply-To: ' field as such: