Hi Ross,
I didn't see any problems with the default CSS definition for the folder list. It looks like there are some basic definitions missing for the list (i.e. The list bullets are shown which should be disabled in #mailboxlist and '#mailboxlist ul')
In previous versions of RoundCube there was an absolute height defined for <li>. This would explain the behavior of Firefox in your screenshots.
Sorry, but it's hard to help you since you changed the CSS and I can't see the whole definition.
Thomas
2005/10/11, Ross Poulton ross@rossp.org:
To clarify the problem I'm having I've prepared two screenshots. These are both on Windows, using Courier IMAP Server on a Debian Linux box (postfix MTA, but that's not really relevant here):
http://rossp.org/stuff/roundcube-folderlist-firefox.png - Mozilla Firefox 1.0.7
http://rossp.org/stuff/roundcube-folderlist-msie.png - Internet Explorer 6.0
As you can see the colors in each are different, and they both treat the subfolder 'RoundCube' (under 'PHP etc') differently. In FireFox it's quite frustrating trying to move messages into the 'RoundCube' folder as it's mostly hidden.
Is anybody else experiencing this?
Ross Poulton
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:09:55 +1000, Ross Poulton ross@rossp.org wrote:
Since upgrading to the latest public release, I've had some funnyness in
my folder listing. I've added the following block in
skins/default/mail.css to make the message list easier to read (I'm using
FireFox 1.0.7, courier imapd, apache, debian linux).
Firstly I modified the '#mailboxlist li.selected a' block, to change the
color from '#FFF' to '#000'. This makes the listing black. Under this
block I then added:
#mailboxlist li.selected ul li a
{
color: #000;
font-weight: normal;
}
This removes the boldness from subfolders of the current folder. Also, all
folders are listed in black which is infinitely easier to read than when
they were white.
I'm finding the CSS for the folder list very odd in the new version - it's
all cascaded (which is great) but the colors are a bit messed up (it looks
completely different in Firefox & IE for me, both look screwed up though).
Is anybody currently looking into this, or even experiencing similar
problems? If not I'll try to clean it up over the next few days.
Ross
www.rossp.org