You are much better off with the CVS version than the current release.
The current relase is old, and not nearly as featureful. Also, I would
say the release has several far more significant bugs than the CVS.
I don't know of any situations of wiped out inboxes, or any disasters of that scale (although you never know), so it should be pretty safe to use. Basically, there might be occasional wierd behavior, but overall the CVS works well.
Rob
Jon Daley wrote:
Hi. This looks like an excellent piece of software. I have shown it to a couple people who care about design sorts of things, and they were quite impressed.
I see the don't-use-the-cvs-version-unless-you-want-to-have-broken-email warning on the sourceforge page, and I am wondering how much you mean it. (:
I am willing to put up with some instability, but I want it to work most of the time. Should I stick with the official releases? I am familiar with cvs (and svn - glad to hear that you are converting over sometime soon) and comfortable working on code.
Do you have a suggestion?