On 03/22/2013 07:53 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote:
And not only the From: address, but ALL addresses that may appear in the typical headers (Cc:, Sender:, Reply-To:, Mail-Reply-To:, whatever, except the own address and of course by removing dupes).
And not only if To: and Reply-To: are the same, but ALWAYS when "Reply all" has been chosen, no matter if it's a list or a "normal" message. That's what a "Reply all" option promises to (and should) do.
It's not so simple. What if it isn't a mailing list post. If sender sets Reply-To. So, Reply-To and From are different. I think that sender intention is clear to not send a reply to both of these addresses. No?
I'll say again. In this case we should use From only when Reply-To == To.
BTW: Is "Sender:" being respected in RC at all...?
As a source for reply recipients, no.
I prefer current solution (1). Because I think that if Reply-To is defined a senders intention is to not receive replies to his From: address, no matter if Reply, Reply-All or Reply-List is used.
In the case of this list for instance, there is no such "senders intention", as the Reply-To: header has been set by the list rather than by the sender, right?
So, it's a list intention, doesn't matter.
I however understand that "private reply" to poster is sometimes wanted.
If I want to make sure to get a reply to one of my list posts to my sender address AND to the list - is there a way at all to set an appropriate Reply-To: header, which will not be changed by Mailman?
I don't know, maybe with Mail-Reply-To set to your address. At least Roundcube should use it instead of Reply-To.