On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 13:53:49 -0400, Jim Pingle wrote: Eric Stadtherr wrote:
I am partially responsible for the sorting "fixes" of late, so
I'd like
to take part in the resolution of this one. Rev288 contains a fix
I made
to the code that manages the results of the server-side sorting
Although
the fix is working, it seems that it negatively impacted the
behavior in
the absence of "SORT" capability on the IMAP server.
I believe the behavior before my fix was to simply display the
messages
in IMAP Message Sequence Number order (basically the order the
messages
arrived in the folder). I think I can come up with an easy patch
to
restore this behavior when "SORT" capability is absent. How does
that
sound?
Sounds good to me. Hopefully it will be an easy fix!
If you need me to try any patches, let me know.
I agree, I'd rather have if fixed than making it another config option -- also I'm open for testing patches against Dovecot, just let me know.
Thanks
P
Thanks, Jim
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006 12:06:09 -0600, Eric Stadtherr estadtherr@gmail.com wrote:
Phil,
I'm a little confused about why you're seeing errors with Dovecot. Dovecot is my IMAP server as well, and it sorts perfectly. What version of Dovecot do you have?
-Eric On Tue, 1 Aug 2006 12:58:49 -0500, phil wrote:
dovecot-1.0.r2 - I don't see anything in dovecot.conf that deals with sorting, so I don't know how it could be on my side (but I"m happy to look further)
P
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean
-- http://fak3r.com - you don't have to kick it -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.