On 11/15/12 10:47, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 11/14/2012 06:48 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote:
Therefore I herewith apply for that both skins share the same core functionality. This is currently not the case, as I had to learn yesterday (using the addressbook during composing).
FWIW, from the users i've spoken with, "Larry" is universally seen as an aesthetic improvement over the "classic" skin. Thanks for all the work that went into the redesign, and kudos to the roundcube dev team for building a robustly skinnable webapp!
However, "Larry" also appears to need a much wider screen to function without horizontal scrolling. This makes "Larry" particularly problematic for mobile users. I've proposed [0] the design of a plugin that might help users switch over to the "classic" skin if their browser is using a horizontal scrollbar, but i don't have the time or the bandwidth to implement it.
I'd be happy to review and give feedback on an attempt at implementation of such a feature, if anyone wants to work on it :)
Regards,
I agree. The larry skin is set to a minimum width of 1150px. I have edited skins/larry/styles.css to change that from 1150 to 1024, which suits many of our users' small laptop screens much better.
I do want to say here that RC has matured nicely over the years. In the early days there were numerous things throughout the package that I tweaked. These days this minimum width and the default behavior of the Reply-all button are about it. The out-of-the-box config and options suits us nicely.
-- Arne Berglund System Administrator, Internet Services Lane Education Service District Eugene, OR ____________