Re: update script

On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, phil wrote:

On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 14:12:49 -0400 (EDT), Jon Daley roundcube@jon.limedaley.com wrote:

...

Why not "svn update"? It takes puts less bandwidth on both servers, and runs much quicker.

So sure, it would remove the need to press 'p' on the first SVN run, since it wouldn't be using https, but I was going by the RC Wiki page: http://trac.roundcube.net/trac.cgi/wiki/Dev_SVN

No.  It uses the same URL as the first run (and you still have to 

do a 'svn checkout' once), but since you already checked it out once, it doesn't have to get every file, but instead just the stuff that has changed since your last update.

Any reason to use the https way vs a basic svn up?

Hopefully this isn't an insult, but have you used subversion 

before? I don't understand the question.