Users

users@lists.roundcube.net

5 participants
2944 discussions

disable inline attachments
by Nick Edwards 07 Oct '13

07 Oct '13

Hello, We are trying to stop inline attachment viewing of attached messages. This is because our anti spam software sends an email warning and attaches the spam, with its usual blurb if you know the risks open attachment, but Roundcube displays the spam messages anyway, is there a way to sop this? Making thme click on the message attached link to be able to view it? I have tried ['client_mimetypes'] setting to '' but I think it interprets this as NULL, the default, which displays set types. Thanks Nikki

1 1

out of office problem
by Antonio Straziota 01 Oct '13

01 Oct '13

Hi all, I'm runnig roundcubemail under kolab groupware on Debian Wheezy. I tried to apply a filter for vacation: matching all of the following rules to contain antonio.straziota(a)example.it<antonio.straziota(a)oldexample.it> ...execute the following actions: Reply with message blablablalba Here my logs: [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: S: "IMPLEMENTATION" "Cyrus timsieved v2.4.17-Debian-2.4.17-5" [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: S: "SASL" "" [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: S: "SIEVE" "comparator-i;ascii-numeric fileinto reject vacation imapflags notify include envelope body relational regex subaddress copy" [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: S: "STARTTLS" [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: S: OK [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: C: CAPABILITY [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: S: "IMPLEMENTATION" "Cyrus timsieved v2.4.17-Debian-2.4.17-5" [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: S: "SASL" "" [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: S: "SIEVE" "comparator-i;ascii-numeric fileinto reject vacation imapflags notify include envelope body relational regex subaddress copy" [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: S: "STARTTLS" [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: S: OK [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: C: STARTTLS [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: S: OK "Begin TLS negotiation now" [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: STARTTLS negotiation successful [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: S: "IMPLEMENTATION" "Cyrus timsieved v2.4.17-Debian-2.4.17-5" [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: S: "SASL" "PLAIN LOGIN" [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: S: "SIEVE" "comparator-i;ascii-numeric fileinto reject vacation imapflags notify include envelope body relational regex subaddress copy" [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: S: OK [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: C: CAPABILITY [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: S: "IMPLEMENTATION" "Cyrus timsieved v2.4.17-Debian-2.4.17-5" [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: S: "SASL" "PLAIN LOGIN" [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: S: "SIEVE" "comparator-i;ascii-numeric fileinto reject vacation imapflags notify include envelope body relational regex subaddress copy" [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: S: OK [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: C: AUTHENTICATE "PLAIN" "ASDvxcv376gsfdaFdsgfdsGDSGdFGDFGGFDGerggsdgf32231qweasdae21e1e==" [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: S: OK [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: C: LISTSCRIPTS [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: S: "roundcube" ACTIVE [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: S: "Straziota" [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: S: OK [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: C: GETSCRIPT "Straziota" [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: S: {133} [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: S: require ["vacation"]; # rule:[AutoReply] if header :contains "From" "antonio.straziota(a)example.it" { vacation "blablalba"; } [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: S: OK [01-Oct-2013 17:22:20,000000 +0200]: C: LOGOUT [01-Oct-2013 17:22:20,000000 +0200]: S: OK "Logout Complete" In logs I can see the script is applied, but seems it is inactive. [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: S: "roundcube" ACTIVE [01-Oct-2013 17:22:19,000000 +0200]: S: "Straziota" Can you give me some tips about debugging my situation? Thanks. Antonio.

2 2

Re: [RCU] Adapting RC for mailing list archiving?
by Kaz Kylheku 26 Sep '13

26 Sep '13

On 26.09.2013 14:07, Reindl Harald wrote: > again: *not* on the roundcube side, roundcube is a mail *client* Not on the Roundcube side? Sure; can we configure the IMAP side somehow so that Roundcube hides things that are not permitted? How about the address book? That comes from a database, not IMAP. > the client *must not* be responsible for permissions > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4314#page-19 The archive IMPA4 account can itself have access restrictions in it. I'm only concerned with not showing irrelevant UI, not proposing that access control depends on whether or not the UI is hidden. Of course if someone logs into that special archive account in regular mode (or with another client), they should not be permitted to mess with the contents. For my purposes, it would be good enough that nobody knows the name of this account or is password. (Of course, the RC installation would have these credentials in its configuration.) > what you want is make roundcube with a mode without email-functions Without *some* e-mail functions, obviously; not without *all* of them. > why do you think that a webmail-client with hidden email-functions > is a good idea as base? Because it's already done, debugged and has a good-looking UI for viewing messages and some search capability. That alone is a lot do develop and test from scratch.

1 0

Re: [RCU] Adapting RC for mailing list archiving?
by Kaz Kylheku 26 Sep '13

26 Sep '13

On 26.09.2013 12:07, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 26.09.2013 20:54, schrieb Kaz Kylheku: >> There is a dearth of decent mailing list archiving software out there >> that can handle HTML and MIME. >> >> I've been thinking: what if RoundCube was adapted so that it can be >> configured to serve as a read-only interface to >> mailing list archive, presenting a mailbox-like view, with all the >> searching and whatnot. >> >> There isn't a big difference between a mail archive and an inbox > > apples and pears - there *is* a big difference > > roundcube is accessing you mail with *IMAP* That's the case now, but it could probably be abstracted away. Or perhaps am archiver can be found or developed which can periodically convert archives into a Maildir structure understood by an IMAP4 server, similarly to the way mail transfer agents like Exim can deliver to such a folder structure. It doesn't seem particularly difficult. An archiver that scans mail archives an generates a Maildir structure sounds easier to develop than one that makes HTML pages. > Roundcube supports shared folders in case the server has the > capabilities > and then you have a tree-structure - where is it the job of roundcube > to > care about archive or not? As follows. The application has to care whether or not is in a public archive mode because otherwise it presents unwanted features not needed for browsing a public archive: * login screen * composing/replying * deleting/moving * mark read/unread * address book * settings * ... > * you can provide the archive with IMAP? > fine - access it with Roundcube Sounds good: looks like we have a basic design! Just this gutted read-only mode is needed on the Roundcube side. Think about it: the RC UI could be quite a superb interface to mail archives.

1 0

Adapting RC for mailing list archiving?
by Kaz Kylheku 26 Sep '13

26 Sep '13

Hi all, There is a dearth of decent mailing list archiving software out there that can handle HTML and MIME. I've been thinking: what if RoundCube was adapted so that it can be configured to serve as a read-only interface to mailing list archive, presenting a mailbox-like view, with all the searching and whatnot. There isn't a big difference between a mail archive and an inbox. Thoughts?

1 0

change default top_quoting for all of users
by Antonio Straziota 26 Sep '13

26 Sep '13

Hi all, I tried to search on the web about this setting, but i found only a lot of discussion about the benefit of the feature. I looked at main.inc.php and I found: $rcmail_config['top_posting'] = false; I tried to change this parameter in true, but nothing happens: all new user has always "start new message below the quote". Any idea? Thanks, Antonio.

2 1

Sorting Message in the thread
by Nieścierowicz Adam 26 Sep '13

26 Sep '13

Hello, Maybe someone can help. Recently changed my view emails to Threaded. Is it possible that sorting within the thread was descending? (latest massage on the top) -- Regards, Adam Nieścierowicz

5 6

ignore namespaces other than inbox / lots of IMAP-list-commands every login
by Stefan Schwarz 23 Sep '13

23 Sep '13

hello everyone, my server has lots of folders in namespaces so roundcube goes over EVERY folder with a list-command. This takes several minutes while the login is waiting for all list-commands to be completed. The webmail is pretty unusable this way, i found no config to speed up/cache or circumvent this behavior. Not sure if this behaviour is a bug or a normal in 0.9.4? I could live with suppressing all folders other than below INBOX, if at least these folders are displayed in time. The servers capability: OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4REV1 NAMESPACE ID AUTH=PLAIN AUTH=LOGIN UIDPLUS STARTTLS ACL METADATA] pi4.de IMAP4rev1 example of imap_debug for a certain folder (repeated for all folders): [23-Sep-2013 16:30:52 +0200]: [5495] C: A0006 LIST "" INBOX/Folder1 [23-Sep-2013 16:30:52 +0200]: [5495] S: * LIST () "/" "INBOX/Folder1" [23-Sep-2013 16:30:52 +0200]: [5495] S: A0006 OK LIST completed greetings Stefan

1 0

Search result eliminated upon replying in 1.0-git?
by Michael Heydekamp 21 Sep '13

21 Sep '13

As I don't want to interfere in the still ongoing codebase cleanup discussion in the dev list, I'm posting it here: Scenario: - Select Sent folder - Initiate a search for a user name or e-mail address - Reply to any message being part of the search result - Send the reply - The search result goes away, folder is being reset to it's default state This applies to 1.0-git only, in 0.9.4 the search result keeps staying right after sending the reply. Win7/64, IE8, all plugins (due to testing) disabled. There may be more scenarios than the above where the same may apply (e.g. selecting a different folder than the Sent folder), but the scenario above was the one where I encountered the behaviour. Replicable? Bug or deliberate...? Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany

2 4

Re: [RCU] /bin/*.sh permissions
by Grant 20 Sep '13

20 Sep '13

>>>> None of the files in /bin/ are executable on my Gentoo system. Should I file a Gentoo bug for that? - Grant >>> >>> Should they be installed executable? I used update.sh recently and >>> had to make it executable first. >>> >>> - Grant >> >> That is a standard security measure in many packages such as this, don't have anything executable unless it is >> necessary. If you need to run those scripts, make them executable > > why? > > bash /path/script.sh works > > but it does not work for standard exploits which mostly rely on > script is executeable by a direct call and most exploit does not > try to handle noexec-mounts and call the interpreter with the > script as argument and in many cases it's simply impossible > to call it this way because you don't have the full shell > for your exploit - so they fail Does the Roundcube process that checks your installation from a browser (can't remember the name) require one of these scripts to be made executable? - Grant

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

Users