Am Donnerstag, 29. Dezember 2011, 18.12:30 schrieb Ismail YENIGUL:
Hi,
I am testing roundcube 0.7-stable. I configured LDAP Adressbook with the following groups properties:
'groups' => array( 'base_dn' => 'dc=mydomain', 'filter' => '(objectClass=rmailGroup)', 'object_classes' => array("top", "mailGroup"), 'member_attr' => 'rfc822member', // name of the member attribute, e.g. uniqueMember 'name_attr' => 'cn', // attribute to be used as group name ),
what is now your correct objectClass? rmailGroup or mailGroup?
I can see the users and groups emails in address book but not group members. When i click on group no member listed. After enabling rouncube debug, I saw the following LDAP query. It seems that RC users full dn as a filter value.
yes. this is how the groupOfNames structure works.
[29-Dec-2011 17:20:55 +0200]: C: Search [(|(member=uid=user@test.com,ou=test.com,o=mail,dc=mydomain)(uniqueMember=ui d=user@test.com,ou=test.com,o=mail,dc=mydomain)(*rfc822member=uid=user@test. com,ou=test.com,o=mail,dc=mydomain*))][dn: dc=mydomain]
But the filter value must be username not full dn as above.
maybe in the group implementation of your server, but not in the one implemented in RC today.
Any idea?
Now, my questions are:
- what server do you use?
- do you control this server? or are you just user of it?
- if you set it up, is this mailGroup someting like a standard?
- how do your schema look like? -> how is objectClass=rmailGroup defined? -> how is rfc822member defined... is it based on member?
- can you please give us an output of ldapsearch with a group object as
exsample?
just to be correct: I am not a LDAP prof, I have just the knowledge about my homebrew openLDAP server and its standard classes/schemas... but maybe other servers are verry different and we have to improve the behaviour of RC? On the other hand I am not willing to adapt RC for all proprietary and undocumented group implementations out in the real (comercial) world!
Andreas