Wake up and look at this:

   Reply-To: Roundcube Users mailing list <users@lists.roundcube.net>

The RCU mailing list stamps this idiocy on everything that passes through it. 

The mailing list for mail-related software is doing Reply-To munging. What's wrong with this picture?

That explains why the same people think it's a good idea to have a "Reply List" button.

On 14.01.2014 17:02, Reindl Harald wrote:

Am 15.01.2014 01:46, schrieb Kaz Kylheku:

I don't agree with "Reply All" doing a "Reply List" if a mailing list is detected. The proper way to reply to a mailing list is "Reply All". Which means ... *There is absolutely no need for a "Reply List" misfeature.* *For users who really want this, the button should be called "Click here to reply in a moronic way if you think that RFC stands for some sort of fried chicken franchise".*

WHICH RFC ARE YOU REFERING?
THERE ARE *MANY* IN CASE OF EMAIL STANDARDS
YOU ARE THE MORON!

Someone who thinks that RFC stands for some kind of R. Fried Chicken is obviously ignorant of all of them.