On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 07:54 +1100, Ben Schmidt wrote:
Hey! I like lists without Reply-To set. I don't think they're braindead,
We need to agree to disagree Ben 
However, your point is valid. If you *really* want to keep all
discussion public for a list, Reply-To is a way to achieve this. It
makes private replies very difficult, which might be what you want.
geez even linux can do copy and paste ya know
It does cause a few problems, though. One is that authors can't set the
Reply-To header the way they want to (and, as was pointed out earlier,
they standardly have the 'right' to set that header).
Agree
Arguably, direct replies also cause problems. For example, the Reply
List button, which as I said earlier, is in a lot of ways my "go to"
button for lists, has problems with those--direct replies don't go via
the list, so don't have a List-Post header, and Reply List doesn't work.
I need to use Reply All, which sends both to the list and the individual
I'm replying to. That's often OK, though, because they replied to me in
that fashion. Nevertheless, it's not always what I want, so sometimes
some manual adjustment is in order.
evolutions ctrl-l (reply list) is a force of habit here, regardless of what the reply setting are, I find it faster to use than clicking on reply/reply-all anyway
(2) I think it only applies to some
lists; others are not like usenet.
Thankfully
Anyway, as far as I'm concerned, no solution is perfect. I think there
+1
are uses for Reply List, I use it regularly in Thunderbird, and I don't
think it's confusing or see any other reason to exclude it. Sure, it's
not necessary, but it's not harmful, either. Consequently, I would like
to see it in RoundCube also. Please consider my vote cast. I've laid out
I have no problems with this and would not object if it was to be a function, although i personally rarely use webmail, I guess if asked,
I would vote FOR this feature too.
Noel