Wake up and look at this:
Reply-To: Roundcube Users mailing list <users@lists.roundcube.net> The RCU mailing list stamps this idiocy on everything that passes through it. The mailing list for mail-related software is doing Reply-To munging. What's wrong with this picture? That explains why the same people think it's a good idea to have a "Reply List" button.On 14.01.2014 17:02, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.01.2014 01:46, schrieb Kaz Kylheku:I don't agree with "Reply All" doing a "Reply List" if a mailing list is detected. The proper way to reply to a mailing list is "Reply All". Which means ... *There is absolutely no need for a "Reply List" misfeature.* *For users who really want this, the button should be called "Click here to reply in a moronic way if you think that RFC stands for some sort of fried chicken franchise".*WHICH RFC ARE YOU REFERING? THERE ARE *MANY* IN CASE OF EMAIL STANDARDS YOU ARE THE MORON!Someone who thinks that RFC stands for some kind of R. Fried Chicken is obviously ignorant of all of them.
_______________________________________________ Roundcube Users mailing list users@lists.roundcube.net http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users
-- ------------------------------------------------------ Juan Carlos Sanchez Hernandez Responsable de Seguridad y Correo Electronico Servicio de Planificacion Informatica y Comunicaciones Universidad Politecnica de Madrid Rectorado Avda. Ramiro de Maeztu 7 28040 Madrid ------------------------------------------------------