I know about the "Reply List" thing; I neglected to mention, in fact, that I tried both "Reply All" and manually invoking "Reply List", with identical results.
Look; "Reply All" is obviously doing the right thing now as I post this reply. It's going to you, Arne, and Cc: to the RCU list!
So does that mean that it did, or that it didn't detect a mailing list?
(Is this feature tested only against the RCU list?)
I don't agree with "Reply All" doing a "Reply List" if a mailing list is detected. The proper way to reply to a mailing list is "Reply All". Which means ...
THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO NEED FOR A "REPLY LIST" MISFEATURE.
FOR USERS WHO REALLY WANT THIS, THE BUTTON SHOULD BE CALLED "CLICK HERE TO REPLY IN A MORONIC WAY IF YOU THINK THAT RFC STANDS FOR SOME SORT OF FRIED CHICKEN FRANCHISE".
On 14.01.2014 16:30, Arne Berglund wrote:
On 2014-01-14 16:12, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
Hi All,
Anyone had the following problem?
When replying to a new mailing list posting with "reply all", the reply goes only To: the mailing list.
Expected behavior: To: the person, Cc: to the mailing list.
The message in question has no Reply-To: header or anything of the sort. The relevant headers are just:
From: user@gmail.com
To: mailinglist@example.com
I'm a subscriber of the mailing list. I hit Reply All, and I get only one address: "mailinglist@example.com".
Unless there is a Reply-To: header, the From: address must be one of the To: recipients!
Default behavior of the Reply-all button is to reply-list if a list is detected. Note the small drop arrow next to the Reply-all button.
My organization found that behavior very annoying, so we made some feature requests. The devs implemented my favorite in version 1.0-beta - http://trac.roundcube.net/ticket/1488734 [1]
Assuming you are not using the beta version, you can tweak the code to eliminate this behavior globally if you wish. It's documented in the ticket above.