The message quoted below has the following headers:
X-Original-To: users@lists.roundcube.net To: RoundCube Mailingliste users@lists.roundcube.net From: Ulli Heist Ulli.Rainer.Heist@gmx.de Mail-Reply-To: Ulli.Rainer.Heist@gmx.de Reply-To: Ulli.Rainer.Heist@gmx.de, Roundcube Users mailing list users@lists.roundcube.net
According to the Reply-To: header, the user apparently wants to receive a reply not only to the list, but also the his personal mail address.
The following happens when I use the several reply options/buttons:
- Click on "Reply to sender": The reply goes to "Ulli.Rainer.Heist@gmx.de"
only (as there is no real name given, this address is obviously taken from the Reply-To: or Mail-Reply-To: header), but not to the list. This behaviour is wrong, IMHO.
- Click on "Reply to list or to sender and all recipients": The reply goes
to "users@lists.roundcube.net" only (as there is no real name given, this address might probably be taken from the X-Original-To: header), but not to the sender. This behaviour is wrong again, IMHO.
- Select "Reply all" from the options of the "Reply to list or to sender
and all recipients" button: The reply goes to "Ulli.Rainer.Heist@gmx.de" (obviously taken from the Reply-To: or Mail-Reply-To: header) and in Cc: to "RoundCube Mailingliste users@lists.roundcube.net" (definitely taken from the To: header). This behaviour is more confusing than wrong, anyway it does still not reflect the content of the Reply-To: header and the addresses are taken from different headers.
- Select "Reply list" from the options of the "Reply to list or to sender
and all recipients" button: The reply goes to "users@lists.roundcube.net" only (as there is no real name given, this address might probably be taken from the X-Original-To: header), but not to the sender. This behaviour may be considered as correct, although even this could still be arguable as well. And I'm wondering why the recipient is taken from the X-Original-To: header (rather than from the To: header).
I believe it should be reconsidered which headers should be respected and take precedence in which scenario. At least in scenarios 1) to 3) above the content of the Reply-To: header should be respected, IMHO.
Furthermore I'm wondering what the purpose of the Mail-Reply-To: header is and why it is created at all. Generally spoken, from my point of view standard RFC headers (To:, Cc:, Reply-To:, probably Sender:) should take precedence over non-standard headers such as Mail-Reply-To: or X-Original-To:.
Regards,
Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany
Am 02.11.2012 21:35, schrieb Ulli Heist:
Hello,
I try to write in english.
Today I've updatet an existing contact/person. In the VCARD from this person is a 'REV:'-tag. This tag is not updatet.
I think that I'm using roundcube 0.82. Would it be possible to add a function which will also update the REV: - tag if this exist's?
Best regards from germany
Ulli
-- http://heist.hobby-site.org/Landstuhl _______________________________________________ Roundcube Users mailing list users@lists.roundcube.net http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users