Hello folks
We're in the final round of getting the 0.9 stable release ready and the question about the next major version arises. I know, our versioning has been very modest and therefore we're at 0.9 after more than 7 years of development. When starting Roundcube back in 2005, my vision about Roundcube version 1.0 was to be feature complete and ready for the average daily needs of email messaging. However, during the years we might have lost our objectivity for things like feature-completeness and that's why I'd like you to speak up for this.
Do you think Roundcube deserves the version 1.0?
My personal gut feeling says "yes, of course". Since version 0.7 we're seeing nearly 100K downloads from our mirrors and each installation of Roundcube serves up to several thousand users. While the total number of Roundcube users is still unclear, I nevertheless think that the broad use of our software is a clear indicator that it actually *is* ready for the average daily messaging.
Together with this simple yes-no question, I'd also like to give you the opportunity to submit your personal "1.0 wish list". Feel free to post your top 3 must-have features you're currently missing in Roundcube. Your feedback will help us to hopefully make the right decisions and to do the further planning for the roadmap beyond the 1.0 release.
Many thanks for your support and participation!
Cheers, Thomas
Thomas,
I changed from Thunderbird a few years ago and have been extremely happy with RCM! I needed to be able to access my mail on my own server from anywhere so I HAD to change but I was surprised about the "feature completeness" of RCM being as good as it was. The ONLY thing I still really miss from Thunderbird is an option to ONLY display folders that have UNREAD mails in them - I have hundreds of folders (I know . . I am a bit obsessive . .) and it would save me a LOT of unneccessary scrolling . .
BTW, I put this on the features request list just after I started using RCM - I don't know if it is still there or not . .
Thanks for a great program!
Regards,
Phil.
On 2013-01-26 23:19, Thomas Bruederli wrote:
Hello folks
We're in the final round of getting the 0.9 stable release ready and the question about the next major version arises. I know, our versioning has been very modest and therefore we're at 0.9 after more than 7 years of development. When starting Roundcube back in 2005, my vision about Roundcube version 1.0 was to be feature complete and ready for the average daily needs of email messaging. However, during the years we might have lost our objectivity for things like feature-completeness and that's why I'd like you to speak up for this.
Do you think Roundcube deserves the version 1.0?
My personal gut feeling says "yes, of course". Since version 0.7 we're seeing nearly 100K downloads from our mirrors and each installation of Roundcube serves up to several thousand users. While the total number of Roundcube users is still unclear, I nevertheless think that the broad use of our software is a clear indicator that it actually *is* ready for the average daily messaging.
Together with this simple yes-no question, I'd also like to give you the opportunity to submit your personal "1.0 wish list". Feel free to post your top 3 must-have features you're currently missing in Roundcube. Your feedback will help us to hopefully make the right decisions and to do the further planning for the roadmap beyond the 1.0 release.
Many thanks for your support and participation!
Cheers, Thomas _______________________________________________ Roundcube Users mailing list users@lists.roundcube.net http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users
I'm very happy with roundcube and I'm using it exclusively for quite a while now.
Two things could be improved a bit:
* It's not easy to
switch between the HTML and text part (For display and when replying). I'm now using HTML mail only, everything else is not really feasible. I would prefer if I could reply in text mode if the original mail is text-only or has text and html parts and the html has no special formatting.
* My folder tree is very large and deeply structured,
which makes the daily task of moving mails from the inbox to the final archive folder more work than with the email clients I was using before. It would be helpful if I could select the target folder with the keyboard in a similiar way like the filtering of the target adress (typing limits the folder list to those folders where the name contains the typed string).
Regards, Manfred
P.S.: At least the current skin Larry seems to be not really usable on the iPad because scrolling is partly not possible. Instead the screen size gets changed.
Am 26.01.2013 13:19, schrieb Thomas Bruederli:
Hello folks
We're
in the final round of getting the 0.9 stable release ready and
the
question about the next major version arises. I know, our
versioning
has been very modest and therefore we're at 0.9 after more
than 7
years of development. When starting Roundcube back in 2005, my
vision
about Roundcube version 1.0 was to be feature complete and
ready for
the average daily needs of email messaging. However, during
the years
we might have lost our objectivity for things like
feature-completeness and that's why I'd like you to speak up for this.
Do you think Roundcube deserves the version 1.0?
My personal gut
feeling says "yes, of course". Since version 0.7 we're
seeing nearly
100K downloads from our mirrors and each installation of
Roundcube
serves up to several thousand users. While the total number
of
Roundcube users is still unclear, I nevertheless think that the
broad
use of our software is a clear indicator that it actually *is*
ready
for the average daily messaging.
Together with this simple yes-no
question, I'd also like to give you
the opportunity to submit your
personal "1.0 wish list". Feel free to
post your top 3 must-have
features you're currently missing in
Roundcube. Your feedback will
help us to hopefully make the right
decisions and to do the further
planning for the roadmap beyond the
1.0 release.
Many thanks for
your support and participation!
Cheers, Thomas
Roundcube Users
mailing list
users@lists.roundcube.net
http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users [1]
Links:
On 2013-01-26 01:19 pm, Thomas Bruederli wrote:
post your top 3 must-have features you're currently missing
+1 for a v1.0 release asap.
. multiple user accounts . collapsible folders (using some ajax tree widget) . an optional simpler theme with no wasted space . an optional wide view layout [folders|message list|content] . tighter Kolab/ownCloud/ISPConfig3 integration
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for the best open source webmail roundcube. Here is my 3 requested feature.
- Mobile device skin (iphone,android)
- PGP, S/MIME encryption support
- XMMP chat client support.
Thanks again.
On 26.01.2013 14:19, Thomas Bruederli wrote:
Hello folks
We're in the final round of getting the 0.9 stable release ready and the question about the next major version arises. I know, our versioning has been very modest and therefore we're at 0.9 after more than 7 years of development. When starting Roundcube back in 2005, my vision about Roundcube version 1.0 was to be feature complete and ready for the average daily needs of email messaging. However, during the years we might have lost our objectivity for things like feature-completeness and that's why I'd like you to speak up for this.
Do you think Roundcube deserves the version 1.0?
My personal gut feeling says "yes, of course". Since version 0.7 we're seeing nearly 100K downloads from our mirrors and each installation of Roundcube serves up to several thousand users. While the total number of Roundcube users is still unclear, I nevertheless think that the broad use of our software is a clear indicator that it actually *is* ready for the average daily messaging.
Together with this simple yes-no question, I'd also like to give you the opportunity to submit your personal "1.0 wish list". Feel free to post your top 3 must-have features you're currently missing in Roundcube. Your feedback will help us to hopefully make the right decisions and to do the further planning for the roadmap beyond the 1.0 release.
Many thanks for your support and participation!
Cheers, Thomas _______________________________________________ Roundcube Users mailing list users@lists.roundcube.net http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users
On 01/26/2013 07:19 AM, Thomas Bruederli wrote:
Do you think Roundcube deserves the version 1.0?
Yup.
Together with this simple yes-no question, I'd also like to give you the opportunity to submit your personal "1.0 wish list". Feel free to post your top 3 must-have features you're currently missing in Roundcube.
This is silly, but in the SQL/*update.sql files, there are lines like,
-- Updates from version 0.8
ALTER TABLE cache DROP COLUMN cache_id; DROP SEQUENCE cache_ids;
ALTER TABLE users DROP COLUMN alias; CREATE INDEX identities_email_idx ON identities (email, del);
Having just downloaded 0.9-beta, I don't know whether this means "the updates that were added in 0.8" or "the updates needed to upgrade from 0.8 to this version." I always have to stop and compare with the previous version to make sure I don't clobber the database.
So my modest 1.0 feature request is for better comments around the statements. For example
-- Update from 0.8.x to 0.9.0 ... -- /end Update from 0.8.x to 0.9.0
Hi there,
to my mind, roundcube is pretty feature complete.
A mobile skin, though, would be a pretty neat feature, i have to agree on that (although one could argue that if you're on mobile you could also use your OSes Mail-Client which would probably more convenient and more responsive than a roundcube mobile skin)
+1 for a 1.0
(It's not quite an argument, but a > 1.0 release really makes it easier to convince deciders in a company, whereas < 1.0 implies "has quirks, doesn't work")
Vom Telefon gesendet...
On 26.01.2013, at 15:17, Ismail YENIGUL ismail.yenigul@surgate.com wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for the best open source webmail roundcube. Here is my 3 requested feature.
- Mobile device skin (iphone,android)
- PGP, S/MIME encryption support
- XMMP chat client support.
Thanks again.
On 26.01.2013 14:19, Thomas Bruederli wrote:
Hello folks
We're in the final round of getting the 0.9 stable release ready and the question about the next major version arises. I know, our versioning has been very modest and therefore we're at 0.9 after more than 7 years of development. When starting Roundcube back in 2005, my vision about Roundcube version 1.0 was to be feature complete and ready for the average daily needs of email messaging. However, during the years we might have lost our objectivity for things like feature-completeness and that's why I'd like you to speak up for this.
Do you think Roundcube deserves the version 1.0?
My personal gut feeling says "yes, of course". Since version 0.7 we're seeing nearly 100K downloads from our mirrors and each installation of Roundcube serves up to several thousand users. While the total number of Roundcube users is still unclear, I nevertheless think that the broad use of our software is a clear indicator that it actually *is* ready for the average daily messaging.
Together with this simple yes-no question, I'd also like to give you the opportunity to submit your personal "1.0 wish list". Feel free to post your top 3 must-have features you're currently missing in Roundcube. Your feedback will help us to hopefully make the right decisions and to do the further planning for the roadmap beyond the 1.0 release.
Many thanks for your support and participation!
Cheers, Thomas _______________________________________________ Roundcube Users mailing list users@lists.roundcube.net http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users
Roundcube Users mailing list users@lists.roundcube.net http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users
hello,
On 2013/01/26 1:19 PM, Thomas Bruederli wrote:
Do you think Roundcube deserves the version 1.0?
I really like it (it's a marketing issue a version 0.x when you suggest a company to move to opensource) :-)
Together with this simple yes-no question, I'd also like to give you the opportunity to submit your personal "1.0 wish list". Feel free to
if you move to 1.0 I think the bigger feature I'd like to have is a real STABLE release; I mean a stable release with security/important patch and no new features. when you introduce a webmail in a production environment where they train users for the webmail usage, it's hard to change things, that's why I'd like a supported for long time stable version.
I know, this feature it's not as simple as add some functionality to rouncube, but it would be a killer feature for this great software :-)
Am 26.01.2013 16:39, schrieb emilio brambilla:
if you move to 1.0 I think the bigger feature I'd like to have is a real STABLE release; I mean a stable release with security/important patch and no new features. when you introduce a webmail in a production environment where they train users for the webmail usage, it's hard to change things, that's why I'd like a supported for long time stable version.
I know, this feature it's not as simple as add some functionality to rouncube, but it would be a killer feature for this great software :-)
+1
Thomas Bruederli wrote:
Hello folks
We're in the final round of getting the 0.9 stable release ready and the question about the next major version arises. I know, our versioning has been very modest and therefore we're at 0.9 after more than 7 years of development. When starting Roundcube back in 2005, my vision about Roundcube version 1.0 was to be feature complete and ready for the average daily needs of email messaging. However, during the years we might have lost our objectivity for things like feature-completeness and that's why I'd like you to speak up for this.
Do you think Roundcube deserves the version 1.0?
Yes it does. I don't know how much it is really used on our mailserver, but I know many of our users have been very pleased to discover it when they've been away from their own PC or smartphone.
On 26/01/2013 16:39, emilio brambilla wrote:
Do you think Roundcube deserves the version 1.0?
I really like it (it's a marketing issue a version 0.x when you suggest a company to move to opensource) :-)
+1
if you move to 1.0 I think the bigger feature I'd like to have is a real STABLE release; I mean a stable release with security/important patch and no new features. when you introduce a webmail in a production environment where they train users for the webmail usage, it's hard to change things, that's why I'd like a supported for long time stable version.
I know, this feature it's not as simple as add some functionality to rouncube, but it would be a killer feature for this great software :-)
+1
On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 16:39 +0100, emilio brambilla wrote:
I mean a stable release with security/important patch and no new features. when you introduce a webmail in a production environment where they train users for the webmail usage, it's hard to change things, that's why I'd like a supported for long time stable version.
-1
so long as you dont drastically change the way end users use the software there is no reason to turn roundcube into another debian/fedora specific program. Or are you also not going to install any new plugins, after all, that's all they are - "new features"
Depriving users of new features will only see your customers find a provider that offers them.
I know, this feature it's not as simple as add some functionality to rouncube, but it would be a killer feature for this great software :-)
There are large networks with a great proportion computer illiterate users that have no problem live migrating through versions thus far, so no reason any organisation of any size can't handle this, be you an ISP, ASP, multi-national, or a SOHO with 2 users.
Am 27.01.2013 02:51, schrieb Noel Butler:
On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 16:39 +0100, emilio brambilla wrote:
I mean a stable release with security/important patch and no new features. when you introduce a webmail in a production environment where they train users for the webmail usage, it's hard to change things, that's why I'd like a supported for long time stable version.
-1
so long as you dont drastically change the way end users use the software there is no reason to turn roundcube into another debian/fedora specific program. Or are you also not going to install any new plugins, after all, that's all they are - "new features"
Depriving users of new features will only see your customers find a provider that offers them
then kiss them goodbye
there are enough customers (especially business customers and they are the ones who really pay money) which are thankful for stability instead braindead featuritis and permanently changing interfaces for the sake of the change
and this is the biggest weakness of opensource: change for the sake of the change because way too much developers prapre implent features instead OPTIMIZE code and make it perfect
the typical enduser has mostly no fun with this and even can not handle changing the label of a button from "save" to "upload images" where there is only one another button with "cancel" - that is the way "customers" work and understand changes
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 02:56 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 27.01.2013 02:51, schrieb Noel Butler:
On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 16:39 +0100, emilio brambilla wrote:
I mean a stable release with security/important patch and no new features. when you introduce a webmail in a production environment where they train users for the webmail usage, it's hard to change things, that's why I'd like a supported for long time stable version.
-1
so long as you dont drastically change the way end users use the software there is no reason to turn roundcube into another debian/fedora specific program. Or are you also not going to install any new plugins, after all, that's all they are - "new features"
Depriving users of new features will only see your customers find a provider that offers them
then kiss them goodbye
no problems your opposition will gladly accept them
there are enough customers (especially business customers and they are the ones who really pay money) which are thankful for stability instead braindead featuritis and permanently changing interfaces for the sake of the change
You seem to speak a lot of shit on many lists, but it seems today your brain is in your arse, if you took that attitude with me, I'd sack your arse. You've been brainwashed by likes of debian trolls for too long.
and this is the biggest weakness of opensource: change for the sake of the change because way too much developers prapre implent features instead OPTIMIZE code and make it perfect
In nearly twenty years at a couple of large ISP's, we've never had this amazing problem you seem to have, and we've had some pretty clueless end users over the years.
I trust you too do not use any plugins, afterall you wont your version of stability and not later features :)
the typical enduser has mostly no fun with this and even can not handle changing the label of a button from "save" to "upload images" where there is only one another button with "cancel" - that is the way "customers" work and understand changes
Never seen that or heard of it before, perhaps you should ask your employer to use something like squirrelmail which doesnt change.
Am 27.01.2013 05:48, schrieb Noel Butler:
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 02:56 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 27.01.2013 02:51, schrieb Noel Butler:
On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 16:39 +0100, emilio brambilla wrote:
I mean a stable release with security/important patch and no new features. when you introduce a webmail in a production environment where they train users for the webmail usage, it's hard to change things, that's why I'd like a supported for long time stable version.
-1
so long as you dont drastically change the way end users use the software there is no reason to turn roundcube into another debian/fedora specific program. Or are you also not going to install any new plugins, after all, that's all they are - "new features"
Depriving users of new features will only see your customers find a provider that offers them
then kiss them goodbye
no problems your opposition will gladly accept them
there are enough customers (especially business customers and they are the ones who really pay money) which are thankful for stability instead braindead featuritis and permanently changing interfaces for the sake of the change
You seem to speak a lot of shit on many lists
your opinion - but trust me: it does not bother me really
but it seems today your brain is in your arse, if you took that attitude with me, I'd sack your arse.
boy you would get this attitude too if you are responsible fro any IT servieyou can imagine and each day anotehr project breaks compatibility for zero benefit
You've been brainwashed by likes of debian trolls for too long.
bullshit - i am fedora user 3.7.4-204.fc18.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Jan 23 16:44:29 UTC 2013
but that does not chnage the fact that as software-developer i can decide between well implemented improvements and chages breaking things in ways changig the user expierence without benefits
and this is the biggest weakness of opensource: change for the sake of the change because way too much developers prapre implent features instead OPTIMIZE code and make it perfect
In nearly twenty years at a couple of large ISP's, we've never had this amazing problem you seem to have, and we've had some pretty clueless end users over the years.
I trust you too do not use any plugins, afterall you wont your version of stability and not later features :)
correct - a webmail has to bes stable and make zero work in my world are business users and they use webmail not as their primary client as i do not undrstand anybody which does
and that is where new features are have to placed: in plugins instead taint the core
the typical enduser has mostly no fun with this and even can not handle changing the label of a button from "save" to "upload images" where there is only one another button with "cancel" - that is the way "customers" work and understand changes
Never seen that or heard of it before
maybe because you are not software developer with direct contact to paying customers taking the phone if you changed things for them because you liked something better
perhaps you should ask your employer to use something like squirrelmail which doesnt change
perpahs i am in a position where i do not need to ask anybody for technical decisions, i decided years ago Horde to use until they splittet into a million subpackages making rpm-build to way too much work, and so we switched to roundcube and if there are happening often chnages like the larry theme - thank you goodbye
and yes - the change to another webmail takes me 2 days and i have done if there are good reasons
Hey guys. cool you are so passionate about things, but why dont you just email each others about the pros and cons of debian and keep this discussion to if RC is ready for 1.0.
thanks,
cor
+1 definitely
The main thing for me would be the addition of a option for showing the preview pane on either the bottom or the right hand side. ie: folders | message list | content. This would definitely be a big usability improvement, especially on wider screens.
Another thing would be the option to have tick boxes (ala Zimbra) to select mails, rather than having to hold down the CTRL/SHFT key which can be a bit awkward at times.
A mobile skin would also be a nice option
On 26.01.2013 20:19, Thomas Bruederli wrote:
Hello folks
We're in the final round of getting the 0.9 stable release ready and the question about the next major version arises. I know, our versioning has been very modest and therefore we're at 0.9 after more than 7 years of development. When starting Roundcube back in 2005, my vision about Roundcube version 1.0 was to be feature complete and ready for the average daily needs of email messaging. However, during the years we might have lost our objectivity for things like feature-completeness and that's why I'd like you to speak up for this.
Do you think Roundcube deserves the version 1.0?
My personal gut feeling says "yes, of course". Since version 0.7 we're seeing nearly 100K downloads from our mirrors and each installation of Roundcube serves up to several thousand users. While the total number of Roundcube users is still unclear, I nevertheless think that the broad use of our software is a clear indicator that it actually *is* ready for the average daily messaging.
Together with this simple yes-no question, I'd also like to give you the opportunity to submit your personal "1.0 wish list". Feel free to post your top 3 must-have features you're currently missing in Roundcube. Your feedback will help us to hopefully make the right decisions and to do the further planning for the roadmap beyond the 1.0 release.
Many thanks for your support and participation!
Cheers, Thomas _______________________________________________ Roundcube Users mailing list users@lists.roundcube.net http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users
Hi Mark,
On Sunday 27 January 2013 00:11:35 Mark Constable wrote:
. tighter Kolab/ownCloud/ISPConfig3 integration
How much more tight to you want the Kolab integration to be? Since Kolab 3 Roundcube is fully integrated and fully support upstream.
Regards, Torsten
Hi
I agree with point 1 from Manfred. Switching between HTML / Plain Text usually ends in tears. I have to use HTML emails all the time to effectively reply to, or forward HTML emails.
Forwarding large or complicated HTML emails (newsletters etc) doesn't always work, I have to switch to Outlook to perm these tasks.
Another nice feature would be able to schedule messages for sending later. I know you can install third-party plugins for this, but it would be nice to have this functionality by default.
Other than that RC is great, I use it every day.
Ted
On 26/01/2013 13:41, Manfred Usselmann wrote:
I'm very
happy with roundcube and I'm using it exclusively for quite a while now.
Two things could be improved a bit:
- It's not easy to
switch between the HTML and text part (For display and when replying). I'm now using HTML mail only, everything else is not really feasible. I would prefer if I could reply in text mode if the original mail is text-only or has text and html parts and the html has no special formatting.
- My folder tree is very large and deeply structured,
which makes the daily task of moving mails from the inbox to the final archive folder more work than with the email clients I was using before. It would be helpful if I could select the target folder with the keyboard in a similiar way like the filtering of the target adress (typing limits the folder list to those folders where the name contains the typed string).
Regards, Manfred
P.S.: At least the
current skin Larry seems to be not really usable on the iPad because scrolling is partly not possible. Instead the screen size gets changed.
Am 26.01.2013 13:19, schrieb Thomas Bruederli:
Hello
folks
We're in the final round of getting the 0.9 stable release
ready and
the question about the next major version arises. I know,
our
versioning has been very modest and therefore we're at 0.9 after
more
than 7 years of development. When starting Roundcube back in
2005, my
vision about Roundcube version 1.0 was to be feature
complete and
ready for the average daily needs of email messaging.
However, during
the years we might have lost our objectivity for
things like
feature-completeness and that's why I'd like you to speak
up for this.
Do you think Roundcube deserves the version 1.0?
My personal gut feeling says "yes, of course". Since version 0.7
we're
seeing nearly 100K downloads from our mirrors and each
installation of
Roundcube serves up to several thousand users. While
the total number
of Roundcube users is still unclear, I nevertheless
think that the
broad use of our software is a clear indicator that it
actually *is*
ready for the average daily messaging.
Together
with this simple yes-no question, I'd also like to give you
the
opportunity to submit your personal "1.0 wish list". Feel free to
post your top 3 must-have features you're currently missing in
Roundcube. Your feedback will help us to hopefully make the right
decisions and to do the further planning for the roadmap beyond the
1.0 release.
Many thanks for your support and participation!
Cheers, Thomas
Roundcube Users
mailing list
users@lists.roundcube.net
http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users [1]
Roundcube Users
mailing list
users@lists.roundcube.net
http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users [1]
Links:
Il 26/01/2013 15:17, Ismail YENIGUL ha scritto:
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for the best open source webmail roundcube. Here is my 3 requested feature.
- Mobile device skin (iphone,android)
- PGP, S/MIME encryption support
- XMMP chat client support.
+1 and thanks Thomas.
Alessio Cecchi is: @ ILS -> http://www.linux.it/~alessice/ on LinkedIn -> http://www.linkedin.com/in/alessice Assistenza Sistemi GNU/Linux -> http://www.cecchi.biz/ @ PLUG -> ex-Presidente, adesso senatore a vita, http://www.prato.linux.it
I think Roundcube is ready for the big 1 if these features could be squeezed in first even better:
- Mobile/tablet compatible skin - I don't think it's even usable on a
Nexus 10 for example. 2. PGP, S/MIME encryption support.
Thanks
Do you think Roundcube deserves the version 1.0?
In my opinion it is a excellent webmail program and worth using 1.0.
Together with this simple yes-no question, I'd also like to give you the opportunity to submit your personal "1.0 wish list". Feel free to post your top 3 must-have features you're currently missing in Roundcube. Your feedback will help us to hopefully make the right decisions and to do the further planning for the roadmap beyond the 1.0 release.
- Search over all Imap-folders
- create new folders in the main window without jumping to settings
Thomas Bruederli wrote:
Together with this simple yes-no question, I'd also like to give you the opportunity to submit your personal "1.0 wish list". Feel free to post your top 3 must-have features you're currently missing in Roundcube. Your feedback will help us to hopefully make the right decisions and to do the further planning for the roadmap beyond the 1.0 release.
Hello again
First of all, thank you for all the feedback you sent in! I could see some clear features many of you mentioned and some of them are even already registered as feature request tickets.
While we're most likely unable to whip up a mobile skin or a fully functional administration panel as soon as for version 1.0 we'll certainly take all your suggestions into account.
In order to not massively delay a the 1.0 release, I tried to collect some of the low hanging fruits in the 1.0 milestone [1]. There's likely more to be added but the big bits (e.g. encryption support, admin panel, mobile skin, etc.) will be spread over future milestones.
I'ld like to say thank you again for participating in our community and for supporting Roundcube. Version 1.0 will rock!
Best, Thomas
On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 20:15:07 +0100, Thomas Bruederli
Hello again
First of all, thank you for all the feedback you sent in! I could see
some
clear features many of you mentioned and some of them are even
already
registered as feature request tickets.
I'm still on an old version because I don't have the time/inclination to push some patches forward that will probably have to be rediffed quite a bit for the latest version.
This patch provides a visual representation of a collapsed thread which contains unread messages. It also provides a visual representation for a collapsed thread which contains flagged messages.
http://trac.roundcube.net/ticket/1486701
I had also created a "flagged children" icon which is analogous to the one for unread children.
http://trac.roundcube.net/attachment/ticket/1486904/flagged_children.png
Screenshots:
Here is an expanded thread with an unread message and a flagged message. No surprises here:
Now here is what it looks like when you collapse it and the patch kicks in:
The patch which is in Trac will not show this exact appearance, because the hollow blue star is the "unread_children.png" from the RoundCube distribution which I found. You guys made the icon, but left it unused!
The hollow yellow star is the flagged_children.png which I created, analogous to the hollow blue star.
The hollow icons are nice because they tell you, it is not necessarily THIS specific message which is flagged or unread, but something in the collapsed thread which is represented by this message.
My mail.html template is patched like this:
roundcube.orig/skins/default/templates/mail.html 2010-08-23 09:42:41.0000 00000 -0700 +++ roundcube/skins/default/templates/mail.html 2010-08-23 09:42:43.000000000 -0 700 @@ -67,7 +67,8 @@
attachmentIcon="/images/icons/attachment.png"
flaggedIcon="/images/icons/flagged.png"
unflaggedIcon="/images/icons/blank.gif"
- unreadchildrenIcon=""
unreadchildrenIcon="/images/icons/unread_children.png"
flaggedchildrenIcon="/images/icons/flagged_children.png"
optionsmenuIcon="/images/icons/columnpicker.gif" />
-
Alessio Cecchi -
Cor Bosman -
Elio Tondo -
emilio brambilla -
Ismail YENIGUL -
Kaz Kylheku -
Manfred Usselmann -
Mark Constable -
max -
Michael Orlitzky -
Noel Butler -
Per Jessen -
Philip Rhoades -
Reindl Harald -
Simon -
Steve Perkins -
Ted Thompson -
Thomas Bruederli -
Thomas Dalichow -
Torsten Grote