On 17.01.2014 11:15, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.01.2014 20:12, schrieb Kaz Kylheku:
On 17.01.2014 10:10, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2014-01-17 1:04 PM, Reindl Harald h.reindl@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 17.01.2014 18:58, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
and RCU maillist now makes it impossible to reply private :(
really? look i did teh impossible!
Really? You call replying to the OP, the list AND a 3rd party (me) 'private'?
Indeed, Reindl did not reply to the list, as claimed; or at least so I'm led to suspect, based on not having received the post you're replying to, keeping in mind that absence of evidence doesn't proves absence. (Perhaps there is a list posting, hitherto delayed as far as delivery to me.)
Going with this hypothesis that there is no list posting, I'm guessing that Benny was on the To: and you were Cc:-d. Check the headers.
However he did it, it was not done by using a simple Reply function, but by manual editing of the To: and Cc:
correct - and that is far away from "impossible"
there is no need to reply-all with a single click there is no need to care about non-subscribers there is no need to not reply only to the list and where you need it you can do it manually
period!
There is no need for mail user agents; you can just telnet to port 25 of your upstream SMTP server, authenticate yourself (use a calculator if necessary for any challenge-response stuff).
Then do your "mail to: ...", "rcpt from: ...", "data ..." and so on. Type the arbitrary headers you want and body, and off you go.
Yes, a strict interpretation of a claim that something is "impossible" is obviously false.
-
Kaz Kylheku