On 09/27/12 08:57, Frank Bonnet wrote:

Hello

Is there an option to hide recipients addresses when there are a lot when reading a message ?

Thank you

Frank,

This bug has already been addressed (TRAC #1488590) for some future release. I'm not certain exactly how it will be implemented, nor when the next release (0.8.2 or 0.9) will be released. Since I had numerous users suffering from this, I found and implemented a fix for 0.8.1.

Edit <rc-root>/skins/larry/mail.css, find the following block in the message view section:

#messageheader, #partheader, #composeheaders { position: relative; padding: 3px 0; background: #f9f9f9; background: -moz-linear-gradient(top, #fff 0%, #e9e9e9 100%); background: -webkit-gradient(linear, left top, left bottom, color-stop(0%,#fff), color-stop(100%,#e9e9e9)); background: -o-linear-gradient(top, #fff 0%, #e9e9e9 100%); background: -ms-linear-gradient(top, #fff 0%, #e9e9e9 100%); background: linear-gradient(top, #fff 0%, #e9e9e9 100%); }

...and replace it with the following two blocks:

#messageheader, #partheader { position: relative; padding: 3px 0; background: #f9f9f9; background: -moz-linear-gradient(top, #fff 0%, #e9e9e9 100%); background: -webkit-gradient(linear, left top, left bottom, color-stop(0%,#fff), color-stop(100%,#e9e9e9)); background: -o-linear-gradient(top, #fff 0%, #e9e9e9 100%); background: -ms-linear-gradient(top, #fff 0%, #e9e9e9 100%); background: linear-gradient(top, #fff 0%, #e9e9e9 100%); max-height: 120px; width: 100%; overflow: auto; }

#composeheaders { position: relative; padding: 3px 0; background: #f9f9f9; background: -moz-linear-gradient(top, #fff 0%, #e9e9e9 100%); background: -webkit-gradient(linear, left top, left bottom, color-stop(0%,#fff), color-stop(100%,#e9e9e9)); background: -o-linear-gradient(top, #fff 0%, #e9e9e9 100%); background: -ms-linear-gradient(top, #fff 0%, #e9e9e9 100%); background: linear-gradient(top, #fff 0%, #e9e9e9 100%); }

I had to split the composeheaders out separately as the "fix" I implemented had minor display issues when composing in Firefox. This has made my users happy, and will be OK until the next release.

Hope this helps.

-- Arne Berglund System Administrator, Internet Services Lane Education Service District Eugene, OR ____________

Frank Bonnet skrev den 27-09-2012 17:57:

Is there an option to hide recipients addresses when there are a lot when reading a message ?

nope, roundcube is not a mailfilter that changes headers, and if it did, what happend if users do use pop3/imap ?

to solve your question, ask senders to stop sending multirecipient

On 09/27/12 11:12, Kaz Kylheku wrote:

On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:17:05 -0700, Arne Berglund aberglund@lesd.k12.or.us wrote:

...

On 09/27/12 08:57, Frank Bonnet wrote:

...

Hello

Is there an option to hide recipients addresses when there are a lot when reading a message ?

Thank you

Frank,

This bug has already been addressed (TRAC #1488590) for some future release. I'm not certain exactly how it will be implemented, nor when the next release (0.8.2 or 0.9) will be released. Since I had numerous users suffering from this, I found and implemented a fix for 0.8.1.

This suffering is inflicted by the goofball who sends an e-mail with a large number of disclosed recipients.

Worse than the cluttered display is that one (or more) of the recipients, a complimentary goofball, will invariably invoke "reply all".

The way to address a large number of people with one e-mail is to use BCC.

Educate the sender.

No argument, it is caused by uneducated/inconsiderate/rude senders. However, when you seem to have many of these types of senders outside your own organization sending this type of cruft, trying to limit the user frustration on my end is worthwhile.

On 09/27/2012 08:12 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:

On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:17:05 -0700, Arne Berglund aberglund@lesd.k12.or.us wrote:

...

On 09/27/12 08:57, Frank Bonnet wrote:

...

Hello

Is there an option to hide recipients addresses when there are a lot when reading a message ?

Thank you

Frank,

This bug has already been addressed (TRAC #1488590) for some future release. I'm not certain exactly how it will be implemented, nor when the next release (0.8.2 or 0.9) will be released. Since I had numerous users suffering from this, I found and implemented a fix for 0.8.1.

This suffering is inflicted by the goofball who sends an e-mail with a large number of disclosed recipients.

Worse than the cluttered display is that one (or more) of the recipients, a complimentary goofball, will invariably invoke "reply all".

The way to address a large number of people with one e-mail is to use BCC.

Educate the sender.

my "senders" are students ... they are many ... :-)

On 09/28/2012 10:26 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:

Am 28.09.2012 10:03, schrieb Frank Bonnet:

...

On 09/27/2012 08:12 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:

...

...

This bug has already been addressed (TRAC #1488590) for some future release. I'm not certain exactly how it will be implemented, nor when the next release (0.8.2 or 0.9) will be released. Since I had numerous users suffering from this, I found and implemented a fix for 0.8.1.

This suffering is inflicted by the goofball who sends an e-mail with a large number of disclosed recipients.

Worse than the cluttered display is that one (or more) of the recipients, a complimentary goofball, will invariably invoke "reply all".

The way to address a large number of people with one e-mail is to use BCC.

Educate the sender.

my "senders" are students ... they are many ... :-)

educate them with "reply all" in clear words - this prevents us from get them in the business life acting the way they are doing now

95% of all users are fucking to stupid to use e-mail at all, but if nobody educates them nothing will change

our students are far to be stupids ! :-) just young and lazy :-)

---

Roundcube Users mailing list users@lists.roundcube.net http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users