On 2014-01-17 1:04 PM, Reindl Harald h.reindl@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 17.01.2014 18:58, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
and RCU maillist now makes it impossible to reply private :(
really? look i did teh impossible!
Really? You call replying to the OP, the list AND a 3rd party (me) 'private'?
On 17.01.2014 10:10, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2014-01-17 1:04 PM, Reindl Harald h.reindl@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 17.01.2014 18:58, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
and RCU maillist now makes it impossible to reply private :(
really? look i did teh impossible!
Really? You call replying to the OP, the list AND a 3rd party (me) 'private'?
Indeed, Reindl did not reply to the list, as claimed; or at least so I'm led to suspect, based on not having received the post you're replying to, keeping in mind that absence of evidence doesn't proves absence. (Perhaps there is a list posting, hitherto delayed as far as delivery to me.)
Going with this hypothesis that there is no list posting, I'm guessing that Benny was on the To: and you were Cc:-d. Check the headers.
However he did it, it was not done by using a simple Reply function, but by manual editing of the To: and Cc:.
On 2014-01-17 2:12 PM, Kaz Kylheku kaz@kylheku.com wrote:
On 17.01.2014 10:10, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2014-01-17 1:04 PM, Reindl Harald h.reindl@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 17.01.2014 18:58, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
and RCU maillist now makes it impossible to reply private :(
really? look i did teh impossible!
Really? You call replying to the OP, the list AND a 3rd party (me) 'private'?
Indeed, Reindl did not reply to the list, as claimed;
You would be mistaken. See the attached original email (with all headers intact).
You can see it was addressed to the list, and CC'd to myself and me@junc.eu.
On 17.01.2014 11:38, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2014-01-17 2:12 PM, Kaz Kylheku kaz@kylheku.com wrote:
On 17.01.2014 10:10, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2014-01-17 1:04 PM, Reindl Harald h.reindl@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 17.01.2014 18:58, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
and RCU maillist now makes it impossible to reply private :(
really? look i did teh impossible!
Really? You call replying to the OP, the list AND a 3rd party (me) 'private'?
Indeed, Reindl did not reply to the list, as claimed;
You would be mistaken. See the attached original email (with all headers intact).
You can see it was addressed to the list, and CC'd to myself and me@junc.eu.
Charles,
I have no evidence in my mail server logs that any failed attempt was made to deliver such a mail.
More significantly, take a look at the mailing list archive:
http://lists.roundcube.net/pipermail/users/2014-January/thread.html
Reindl's posting does not appear there!
Or click on this one, and then "previous message":
http://lists.roundcube.net/pipermail/users/2014-January/010302.html
Goes to Benny's.
I am looking at the .eml attachment (thanks for that) as raw text in a text editor and *do* see the To:.
Message-ID: <52D970BB.9030309@...>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 19:04:43 +0100
From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@...>
Organization: the lounge interactive design
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roundcube Users mailing list users@lists.roundcube.net CC: me@..., CMarcus@...
(I occluded the domain parts of sensitive e-mail addresses with ... in case the list archiver fails to do it in the above context.)
Looks like the list blocked this, perhaps because of the CC: lines; if so, how deplorable.
It did fool Reindl into thinking he's doing the impossible, though. :)
On 17.01.2014 12:32, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
More significantly, take a look at the mailing list archive:
http://lists.roundcube.net/pipermail/users/2014-January/thread.html
Reindl's posting does not appear there!
Oops, I now see that is because *no* posts by anyone of that name appear there in any recent months.
Never mind ...
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 11:12 -0800, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
Indeed, Reindl did not reply to the list, as claimed; or at least so I'm led to suspect, based on not having received the post you're replying to, keeping in mind that absence of evidence doesn't proves absence.
Harald is currently moderated and can not post to this list, so you will not see his posts via the list server.
-
Charles Marcus -
Kaz Kylheku -
Noel Butler