Hi,
I've (re)started some changes in folder management. Goal is to be able
to move a folder to another parent (or top-) folder.
Attached patch shows what I have so far; changing a folder's parent works.
Things to be done:
- Refresh subscription list after moving a folder
- Make newly selected folder selectable
- Optional: Add 'parent' dropdown in new-folder form
I might even need to make sure another separator than '.' can be used,
although I haven't checked the need for that (rfc, docs).
Any comments so far?
Should I continue or go another way?
I tried drag&drop, which worked more or less, except for two things:
- A folder in the top of the list cannot be moved to a folder in the
bottom of the list, if the list is bigger than the table (ie the
scrollbar doesn't move along). Though that can possibly be fixed with a
bit of JS.
- I have no idea what the best dropping place would be if I want to move
a folder to the root of the tree.
Robin
--- 8< --- detachments --- 8< ---
The following attachments have been detached and are available for viewing.
http://detached.gigo.com/rc/Qt/FW489Ms+/parent-folder.200708.patch
Only click these links if you trust the sender, as well as this message.
--- 8< --- detachments --- 8< ---
_______________________________________________
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
Hi all,
I just checked out Revision 766 and it looks like viewing binary
attachments is broken. Clicking to open a JPEG attachment opens the new
viewing window, and fills the iframe with with the decoded data, but in
text form.
So far it looks as though the "Content-Type" is not being set correctly,
and is defaulting to "text/html".
In-line viewing of images in the preview pane is still working though.
Anyone able to tackle this?
Rich
_______________________________________________
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
Hi,
I've noticed that when using an ldap address book, the addresses are not
listed in the address book, except when doing a search. This looks a little
like a bug to me, because the list_records function is called, but will never
return anything.
I've attached a minor patch that sets the default filter, when list_records is
called. This means that when $this->_exec_search is called, it's will return
a result.
I hope this patch might help.
Regards
Glen Ogilvie
--- 8< --- detachments --- 8< ---
The following attachments have been detached and are available for viewing.
http://detached.gigo.com/mm/q8/HsaHBnxn/rcube_ldap_filter.patch
Only click these links if you trust the sender, as well as this message.
--- 8< --- detachments --- 8< ---
_______________________________________________
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
When I click on a download (ZIP) it pops up the save-as in my browser,
but the entire interface stops working. I remember something about a
"busy" flag.
Can anyone enlighten me? ;-)
Till
_______________________________________________
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
Please get back to me (till, klimpong(a)gmail.com) off-list ASAP. :-)
We need to rearrange some things and this is also a one time
opportunity to tell us if you are still active. ;-))
Thanks,
Till
_______________________________________________
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
FYI, I just requested the FreeBSD port to be updated since the version
used is from 2006.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: till <till(a)php.net>
Date: Aug 29, 2007 2:44 PM
Subject: request to update roundcube port
To: farrokhi(a)freebsd.org
Hi,
it would be great if you updated the roundcube port (mail/roundcube)
to the 0.1-rc1.1 release.
http://www.roundcube.net/?p=downloads
Thanks,
Till
_______________________________________________
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
Hello,
I change it a bit, to introduce french words instead english idiotisms.
Regards
--
Mickaƫl Wolff aka Lupus Michaelis
Racine <http://lupusmic.org>
Blog <http://blog.lupusmic.org>
--- 8< --- detachments --- 8< ---
The following attachments have been detached and are available for viewing.
http://detached.gigo.com/rc/VE/MW7+dvJG/translation-french.t.gz
Only click these links if you trust the sender, as well as this message.
--- 8< --- detachments --- 8< ---
_______________________________________________
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
Trying to send again now that I'm actually subscribed. Hopefully
it'll make it through this time! Sorry for all the forward headers.
--
Jordan Wiens
Contributing Technology Editor, Security
Network Computing/InformationWeek
352.871.5109 (m)
jordanwiens (im)
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Jordan Wiens <jwiens(a)nwc.com>
> Date: August 12, 2007 6:35:34 PM EDT
> To: dev(a)lists.roundcube.net
> Subject: Fwd: roundcube vulnerability scan
>
> Sent this to roundcube(a)gmail.com, but never heard back. Since this
> is a public list, I've removed descriptions of the raw
> vulnerabilities. Would prefer to handle those privately unless
> explicitly told otherwise. Feel free to contact me via email or
> phone.
>
> --
> Jordan Wiens
> Contributing Technology Editor, Security
> Network Computing/InformationWeek
> 352.871.5109 (m)
> jordanwiens (im)
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Jordan Wiens <jwiens(a)nwc.com>
>> Date: July 20, 2007 6:59:50 PM EDT
>> To: roundcube(a)gmail.com
>> Subject: roundcube vulnerability scan
>>
>> I'm using roundcube as a test application for a review on web
>> application vulnerability scanners (http://
>> www.networkcomputing.com/rollingreviews/Web-Applications-
>> Scanners/) and as a result, I expect to have a variety of
>> vulnerabilities discovered over the course of the review.
>>
>> I wanted to email you to ask a couple of questions.
>>
>> First, how should I submit bugs discovered? Just use trac? Will
>> that make them public? Private email? Let me know what you
>> prefer, I'm happy to do either.
>>
>> Secondly, would you like me to publicly mention which open source
>> webmail project I used for my testing? Or stay anonymous? I'd
>> prefer to not make it public at the very least until all the flaws
>> discovered are fixed, though I doubt that will be a problem since
>> writing the articles takes a while to go through the whole
>> magazine process. Other than that, I'll leave the option up to
>> you as to whether you prefer to be discussed. Note that I don't
>> plan on discussion the exact details of particular
>> vulnerabilities, just the general class and types.
>>
>> Anyway, I've already stumbled across a few ways to evade the cross-
>> site scripting blocking filters when manually looking through the
>> code to see what the application scanners will be up against.
>>
>> Here's samples of vulns I've found so far that will automatically
>> execute javascript without user action besides just opening the
>> email:
>
> <DELETED>
>
>> --
>> Jordan Wiens
>> Contributing Editor, Security
>> Network Computing/InformationWeek
>> 352.871.5109 (m)
>> jordanwiens (im)
>>
>>
>> *http://www.networkcomputing.com/rollingreviews/Web-Applications-
>> Scanners/
>
_______________________________________________
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/