Dev

dev@lists.roundcube.net

1 participants
4305 discussions

download + javascript?
by till 30 Aug '07

30 Aug '07

When I click on a download (ZIP) it pops up the save-as in my browser, but the entire interface stops working. I remember something about a "busy" flag. Can anyone enlighten me? ;-) Till _______________________________________________ List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/

2 2

For those with SVN rights on Roundcube
by till 29 Aug '07

29 Aug '07

Please get back to me (till, klimpong(a)gmail.com) off-list ASAP. :-) We need to rearrange some things and this is also a one time opportunity to tell us if you are still active. ;-)) Thanks, Till _______________________________________________ List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/

1 0

Fwd: request to update roundcube port
by till 29 Aug '07

29 Aug '07

FYI, I just requested the FreeBSD port to be updated since the version used is from 2006. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: till <till(a)php.net> Date: Aug 29, 2007 2:44 PM Subject: request to update roundcube port To: farrokhi(a)freebsd.org Hi, it would be great if you updated the roundcube port (mail/roundcube) to the 0.1-rc1.1 release. http://www.roundcube.net/?p=downloads Thanks, Till _______________________________________________ List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/

1 0

French translation
by Lupus Michaelis 29 Aug '07

29 Aug '07

Hello, I change it a bit, to introduce french words instead english idiotisms. Regards -- Mickaël Wolff aka Lupus Michaelis Racine <http://lupusmic.org> Blog <http://blog.lupusmic.org> --- 8< --- detachments --- 8< --- The following attachments have been detached and are available for viewing. http://detached.gigo.com/rc/VE/MW7+dvJG/translation-french.t.gz Only click these links if you trust the sender, as well as this message. --- 8< --- detachments --- 8< --- _______________________________________________ List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/

1 0

Fwd: roundcube vulnerability scan
by Jordan Wiens 28 Aug '07

28 Aug '07

Trying to send again now that I'm actually subscribed. Hopefully it'll make it through this time! Sorry for all the forward headers. -- Jordan Wiens Contributing Technology Editor, Security Network Computing/InformationWeek 352.871.5109 (m) jordanwiens (im) Begin forwarded message: > From: Jordan Wiens <jwiens(a)nwc.com> > Date: August 12, 2007 6:35:34 PM EDT > To: dev(a)lists.roundcube.net > Subject: Fwd: roundcube vulnerability scan > > Sent this to roundcube(a)gmail.com, but never heard back. Since this > is a public list, I've removed descriptions of the raw > vulnerabilities. Would prefer to handle those privately unless > explicitly told otherwise. Feel free to contact me via email or > phone. > > -- > Jordan Wiens > Contributing Technology Editor, Security > Network Computing/InformationWeek > 352.871.5109 (m) > jordanwiens (im) > > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Jordan Wiens <jwiens(a)nwc.com> >> Date: July 20, 2007 6:59:50 PM EDT >> To: roundcube(a)gmail.com >> Subject: roundcube vulnerability scan >> >> I'm using roundcube as a test application for a review on web >> application vulnerability scanners (http:// >> www.networkcomputing.com/rollingreviews/Web-Applications- >> Scanners/) and as a result, I expect to have a variety of >> vulnerabilities discovered over the course of the review. >> >> I wanted to email you to ask a couple of questions. >> >> First, how should I submit bugs discovered? Just use trac? Will >> that make them public? Private email? Let me know what you >> prefer, I'm happy to do either. >> >> Secondly, would you like me to publicly mention which open source >> webmail project I used for my testing? Or stay anonymous? I'd >> prefer to not make it public at the very least until all the flaws >> discovered are fixed, though I doubt that will be a problem since >> writing the articles takes a while to go through the whole >> magazine process. Other than that, I'll leave the option up to >> you as to whether you prefer to be discussed. Note that I don't >> plan on discussion the exact details of particular >> vulnerabilities, just the general class and types. >> >> Anyway, I've already stumbled across a few ways to evade the cross- >> site scripting blocking filters when manually looking through the >> code to see what the application scanners will be up against. >> >> Here's samples of vulns I've found so far that will automatically >> execute javascript without user action besides just opening the >> email: > > <DELETED> > >> -- >> Jordan Wiens >> Contributing Editor, Security >> Network Computing/InformationWeek >> 352.871.5109 (m) >> jordanwiens (im) >> >> >> *http://www.networkcomputing.com/rollingreviews/Web-Applications- >> Scanners/ > _______________________________________________ List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/

4 7

German translation
by Marcel Schlesinger 24 Aug '07

24 Aug '07

Hi @all, the previous german translation was full of mistakes so a made a new one. I hope you enjoy. Many greets, Marcel --- 8< --- detachments --- 8< --- The following attachments have been detached and are available for viewing. http://detached.gigo.com/mm/TX/MCf5er1s/messages.inc http://detached.gigo.com/mm/TX/MCf5er1s/labels.inc Only click these links if you trust the sender, as well as this message. --- 8< --- detachments --- 8< --- _______________________________________________ List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/

1 0

Rev 668 change to index.php breaks IE7 AJAX...
by Jim Pingle 23 Aug '07

23 Aug '07

Since r668, IE's AJAX calls have been broken (at least for us). I didn't notice this until I updated our main RC install the other day, which hadn't been updated in several weeks. One of our (very few) IE users called yesterday and said it sat there saying "Checking for new messages..." and never went back to normal. In r668, there is now a check in index.php for a roundcube-specific header, but this check isn't working with IE7. This is, apparently, because IE7 is forcing the header name to lowercase (verified via tcpflow) This small patch fixes the issue for me. It adds a check for an all-lowercase version of the header. Jim --- 8< --- detachments --- 8< --- The following attachments have been detached and are available for viewing. http://detached.gigo.com/mm/E9/VY2XDN+S/index-php-patch.txt Only click these links if you trust the sender, as well as this message. --- 8< --- detachments --- 8< --- _______________________________________________ List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/

2 2

Re: [RCD] Cannot open big mails
by Mirko Buffoni 23 Aug '07

23 Aug '07

> // use gzip compression if supported > if (function_exists('ob_gzhandler') && ini_get('zlib.output_compression')) > ob_start('ob_gzhandler'); After the change, things are getting better: without compression "GET /?_task=mail&_action=show&_uid=150&_mbox=INBOX HTTP/1.1" 200 1754763 with compression "GET /?_task=mail&_action=show&_uid=150&_mbox=INBOX HTTP/1.1" 200 32523 Sorry for the noise... Mirko _______________________________________________ List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/

1 0

Re: [RCD] Cannot open big mails
by Mirko Buffoni 23 Aug '07

23 Aug '07

> > Thank you for your hints. > >1) Enable logging (config/main) >2) Then open one of your big emails and check logs/error (tail -f ...) >3) Then you probably need to finetune settings (memory_limit, etc.) in php.ini You were right. PHP Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 8388608 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 4210936 bytes) in .../rcwebmail/program/steps/mail/func.inc on line 808 I adjusted memory_limit. It's taking so much memory because the message is preparsed and email and web addresses are translated into <a>...</a> sequences, and I had a lot of them because the mail was a report. Now, since the mail is big, how can I know if the message is sent compressed? // set output buffering if ($_action != 'get' && $_action != 'viewsource') { // use gzip compression if supported if (function_exists('ob_gzhandler') && ini_get('zlib.output_compression')) ob_start('ob_gzhandler'); else ob_start(); } _task=mail&_action=show should include the case of compressed output, but the message took quite some time... how can I be sure it was transmitted compressed? Mirko _______________________________________________ List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/

1 1

Cannot open big mails
by Mirko Buffoni 23 Aug '07

23 Aug '07

Hi, I generally lurked to this list. I'm writing to you because I'm getting a problem which I cannot identify the cause. I'm using roudcube-0.1-rc1, with courierimap installed together with a qmail-toaster package. Everything works nice, beside a point: - an email with body bigger than 200k (i'm experiencing problems with mails of 400 and 600k) when opened gives a black page. All other mails (tiny) open correctly. What could it be the cause? cannot rc handle mails with big body content? Thank you for your hints. Mirko _______________________________________________ List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/

2 1

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

Dev