--- 8< --- detachments --- 8< ---
The following attachments have been detached and are available for viewing.
http://detached.gigo.com/rc/DY/8jN1QQyi/labels.inc
Only click these links if you trust the sender, as well as this message.
--- 8< --- detachments --- 8< ---
_______________________________________________
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
BT/aba52c80
Hey all, I'm working on a plugin that handles One Time Passwords and Single Signon for our company. The OTP keys have a max session length, so people can't leave their windows open forever in a remote/untrusted location.
This means that I am confronted with imap_connect failures when a key expires. And RC does not seem to handle that very well. Is there a way that I'm not seeing where one could gracefully handle imap_connect failures? For instance by redirecting to the login page with some error message?
Regards,
Cor
_______________________________________________
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
BT/aba52c80
While rewritting messages caching code I decided to store message flags
in one field as a binary sum. Of course the main idea is to get some
unification and better performance. The bad side of this solution is
that we can store this way only known flags defined in the code.
So my question is, do you know/use other flags than listed below (\ and
$ chars removed)?
SEEN
DELETED
ANSWERED
FLAGGED
DRAFT
MDNSENT
FORWARDED
SUBMITPENDING
SUBMITTED
JUNK
NONJUNK
LABEL1
LABEL2
LABEL3
LABEL4
LABEL5
--
Aleksander 'A.L.E.C' Machniak
LAN Management System Developer [http://lms.org.pl]
Roundcube Webmail Developer [http://roundcube.net]
---------------------------------------------------
PGP: 19359DC1 @@ GG: 2275252 @@ WWW: http://alec.pl
_______________________________________________
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
BT/aba52c80
Am Dienstag, 13. September 2011, um 19.19:27 schrieben Sie:
> Hi Andudi,
> It will be great if the ldap addressbook will have the form:
>
> $rcmail_config['ldap_public']['DOMAIN.TLD'] and could be shared accross
> all users of the DOMAIN.TLD domain.
hi Juanjo
a have no idea what you mean... if you mean user based addressbook, this is
possible allready, see the comments in the config file.
Andreas
_______________________________________________
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
BT/aba52c80
Hello there :D
I'm a new subscriber in the dev-mailing list, my name is Tilman
Stremlau, I'm 17 years old and I use roundcube as my main mail-client
since I try to get away from Google Mail. So my aim is to help
developing the project and some plugins (my fist one is html5_notifier
http://www.roundcubeforum.net/7-third-party-contributions/46-api-based-plug…
).
There is a point I am not happy with:
The implementation of the hook "new_messages". The hook is just fired,
if a new mail arrived in the current opened mailbox.
On my opinion is this very useless for plugins. It would be better if
it is fired every time a new message arrives. Check if it's the current
mailbox could be done in the plugin itself - if necessary.
Changing the Code:
check_recent.inc line 37
" if ($mbox_name == $current && ($status =
$IMAP->mailbox_status($mbox_name))) {"
to
" $status = $IMAP->mailbox_status($mbox_name);
if ($status & 1)
{
if ($RCMAIL->config->get('focus_on_new_message', true) &&
$mbox_name == $current)
{
$OUTPUT->command('new_message_focus');
}
// trigger plugin hook
$RCMAIL->plugins->exec_hook('new_messages', array('mailbox' =>
$mbox_name));
}
if ($mbox_name == $current && $status)
{"
deleting line 73-78 (old hook call)
Another thing: The Class-File html.php
The complete structure is not perfect. I could use html_checkbox::a();
to create a link and there are many unnecessary sprintf etc.
If you want, I rewrite the complete class and send it as attachment to
you. This week I have enought time :D
All in all Roundcube is the best webclient I ever tested and I love it!
Big admission to the developers, you did a good job!
Regards,
Tilman Stremlau
P.S. Sry for my bad english, I am not the best in speaking english, but
I try to do my best :D I'm not unhappy about corrections, otherwise I
don't get better :D
_______________________________________________
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
BT/aba52c80
Hi list,
unfortunately use Outlook not the X-PRIORITY header for the priority, it
use IMPORTANCE with values like "high" or "low".
SquirrelMail <http://squirrelmail.org/> use a nice function to convert
this value to the numeric X-PRIORITY values.
The code is of course also GPL.
Greetings,
Tim Gerundt
p.s.: I tried to use Trac, but I always got a "OperationalError:
database is locked" error if I submitted a ticket. :(
--- 8< --- detachments --- 8< ---
The following attachments have been detached and are available for viewing.
http://detached.gigo.com/rc/as/1kKQCAP/support-more-priorit.patch
Only click these links if you trust the sender, as well as this message.
--- 8< --- detachments --- 8< ---
_______________________________________________
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
BT/aba52c80