So you're saying a clean commit history is more important than giving me proper credit where it is due? Again, that is not acceptable. Besides - why is the commit history that important to begin with?
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:06 PM, A.L.E.C alec@alec.pl wrote:
On 09/18/2013 11:47 AM, David Deutsch wrote:
As for the "last thing" - Yeah that's not acceptable to me. Erasing the history of how I did my work obfuscates my contribution and I would find that rather insulting. I'm happy to contribute and I'm happy to bend my contribution to your specifications. But come on, man, don't mess with
the
karma aspect of it.
Come on. The first PR has ca. 60 commits. This will make commit history fucked up seriously. I will not merge such PR. I expect other code-style PRs to have 10-20 commits, this is still too much.
-- Aleksander 'A.L.E.C' Machniak LAN Management System Developer [http://lms.org.pl] Roundcube Webmail Developer [http://roundcube.net]
PGP: 19359DC1 @@ GG: 2275252 @@ WWW: http://alec.pl _______________________________________________ Roundcube Development discussion mailing list dev@lists.roundcube.net http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/dev