Well, the major reason of the development is just that there is no one yet (free). Also is a good point that smart phones bring up integrated facilities of webmail client.
Taking consideration of this i think that could be reasonable to develop a basic functionality mobile skin, the question would be how much basic should be......
2013/4/14 Rosali myroundcube@mail4us.net
Am 14.04.2013 16:05, schrieb David Carter:
On Sun, 14 Apr 2013, Rosali wrote:
IMO, the only reason to have a mobile skin (with limited features) is contacts and may be calendaring integration. The preferable way to serve mobile devices is to use CalDAV/CardDAV. Almost all mobile devices have fully integrated clients for IMAP/CalDAV/CardDAV. So, is it really necessary to have a (feature limited) web interface? Just me 5 cents.
I agree that the integrated clients will almost always offer a better user experience as they are optimised for the device in question.
The one significant advantage that I can see is that the integrated clients have to be configured to use a given IMAP server, while people can just click on a URL to get the (limited) web interface.
So I can borrow someone else's mobile device to check my mail, if I happen to have left my own at home.
That's a point. From a developers point of view I wouldn't be encouraged to spend time for the development of a mobile skin (that's my point of view, I'm not a member of the Roundcube Dev Team). There are commercial mobile skins available. May be you want to check http://roundcubeskins.net/**portfolio/iclassic/http://roundcubeskins.net/portfolio/iclassic/ .
______________________________**_________________ Roundcube Development discussion mailing list dev@lists.roundcube.net http://lists.roundcube.net/**mailman/listinfo/devhttp://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/dev