On Thu Dec 13 23:28:23 CET 2012 Michael Heydekamp wrote:
Am 13.12.2012 17:13, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322#section-3.4 can be angle-addr only when there is a non-empty display-name.
The "only" in this sentence is not correct.
Right. I should have had more coffee yesterday :-/
RFC-wise, both are correct.
But being a purist in this respect, I would also prefer if Roundcube would eliminate the angle brackets if no display name is given.
The problem is that some software eliminates those angle-brackets, thereby breaking any DKIM signature added meanwhile. I'll make a patch to optionally avoid such behavior in Courier-MTA. (Belt and brackets.)
Of course, it may be irritating for users not to be able to set an address exactly the way they want to. It takes a bit of wisdom to handle this issue adequately... Should I file a feature request for this?
Ciao Ale
On 12/14/2012 12:15 PM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
Of course, it may be irritating for users not to be able to set an address exactly the way they want to. It takes a bit of wisdom to handle this issue adequately... Should I file a feature request for this?
0f4e2f81342caed51709674c96ce5919cfc5913b should fix the issue.
On Fri 14/Dec/2012 12:39:44 +0100 A.L.E.C wrote:
On 12/14/2012 12:15 PM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
Of course, it may be irritating for users not to be able to set an address exactly the way they want to. It takes a bit of wisdom to handle this issue adequately... Should I file a feature request for this?
0f4e2f81342caed51709674c96ce5919cfc5913b should fix the issue.
Yep, thank you. The second change might have sufficed, if users knew what they do... If you have a chance to fix the comments it would be great.