Hello!
Yesterday I filed a feature request for Mail-Followup-To support: http://trac.roundcube.net/ticket/1485547
I'd like to try to implement it (or parts of it) myself, but at first I'm curious about your position to Mail-Followup-To support. Do you want this feature?
I'm asking because coding a patch that will not find its way into the tree can be frustrating, so positive feedback on this will clearly boost my motivation ;)
LG, Daniel
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Daniel Faber mail@daniel-faber.de wrote:
Hello!
Yesterday I filed a feature request for Mail-Followup-To support: http://trac.roundcube.net/ticket/1485547
I'd like to try to implement it (or parts of it) myself, but at first I'm curious about your position to Mail-Followup-To support. Do you want this feature?
I'm asking because coding a patch that will not find its way into the tree can be frustrating, so positive feedback on this will clearly boost my motivation ;)
Sounds good. :-) _______________________________________________ List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Daniel Faber wrote:
Yesterday I filed a feature request for Mail-Followup-To support: http://trac.roundcube.net/ticket/1485547
I'd like to try to implement it (or parts of it) myself, [...]
I attached a first patch to this ticket that lets RoundCube respect Mail-Followup-To and Mail-Reply-To when replying to a message that contains these headers.
I'd like to ask someone with appropriate privileges to to commit this patch. If there are any concerns about it, please tell me what can be improved.
Daniel
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
Daniel Faber wrote:
I attached a first patch to this ticket [1485547] that lets RoundCube respect Mail-Followup-To and Mail-Reply-To when replying to a message that contains these headers.
Any comments on this?
Daniel
--- 8< --- detachments --- 8< --- The following attachments have been detached and are available for viewing. http://detached.gigo.com/rc/jD/C9GxmtMW/signature.asc Only click these links if you trust the sender, as well as this message. --- 8< --- detachments --- 8< ---
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
Hello Devs,
I just like to remind you of my Mail-Followup-To/Mail-Reply-To patch ;)
As posted to the bug tracker [1], MFT/MRT-support consists of four "sub-features":
- Respect MFT / MRT when replying to a message that contains these headers.
- When viewing a message that contains these headers, show them. This is not absolutely required, but makes reply behaviour more transparent.
- When composing a new message it should be possible to set these headers. I'd prefer the same way it is already possible to set Reply-To.
- Let RoundCube automatically set MFT in outgoing messages according to a list of subscribed mailing list that can be configured by the user.
The patch I attached to the ticked solves item 1. This is useful even without the other items so I'd be glad if you take a look at it.
For general information about Mail-Followup-To please read [2]. You may also like to read Mozilla Bug 204339 [3] since there was a large discussion about usefulness of MFT.
For Item 2 I have another patch that I attached to the ticked today.
If Mail-Reply-To is is present, Reply-To gets hidden, because MRT overrides Reply-To. This keeps header view simpler.
Daniel
[1] http://trac.roundcube.net/ticket/1485547 [2] http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html [3] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204339
--- 8< --- detachments --- 8< --- The following attachments have been detached and are available for viewing. http://detached.gigo.com/rc/e6/vyKLMr3u/signature.asc Only click these links if you trust the sender, as well as this message. --- 8< --- detachments --- 8< ---
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
-
Daniel Faber -
till