It's a bit unfortunate that any Cc, Bcc and Reply-To addresses entered in an identity are still not shown in the compose window (so that you can never be 100% sure if the respective headers are filled correctly), but I just encountered an even more serious issue:
Unlike to Cc and Bcc, where I can manually add any other addresses while the ones entered in the identity are being preserved, any address added to the Reply-To field is not really "additional": It does overwrite the ones defined in the identity.
Of course, I realized that only AFTER I sent the message...
I request to correct this (and furthermore, I request to display all addresses being defined in the identity).
I'm fully aware that it may get somewhat complicated if you're switching identies in the compose window back and forth (to distinguish between manually added addresses and addresses being defined in the identity...). But anyway, to display all of them would instantly disclose any problems and the user would at least have the chance to correct them manually.
Cheers,
Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany
Sorry, there is of course no Cc field in the identity, so please ignore mentioning this specific entry.
But just this, the rest still remains a problem...
Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany
Am 02.02.2013 00:34, schrieb Michael Heydekamp:
It's a bit unfortunate that any Cc, Bcc and Reply-To addresses entered in an identity are still not shown in the compose window (so that you can never be 100% sure if the respective headers are filled correctly), but I just encountered an even more serious issue:
Unlike to Cc and Bcc, where I can manually add any other addresses while the ones entered in the identity are being preserved, any address added to the Reply-To field is not really "additional": It does overwrite the ones defined in the identity.
Of course, I realized that only AFTER I sent the message...
I request to correct this (and furthermore, I request to display all addresses being defined in the identity).
I'm fully aware that it may get somewhat complicated if you're switching identies in the compose window back and forth (to distinguish between manually added addresses and addresses being defined in the identity...). But anyway, to display all of them would instantly disclose any problems and the user would at least have the chance to correct them manually.
Cheers,
Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany _______________________________________________ Roundcube Development discussion mailing list dev@lists.roundcube.net http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/dev
On 02/02/2013 12:34 AM, Michael Heydekamp wrote:
Unlike to Cc and Bcc, where I can manually add any other addresses while the ones entered in the identity are being preserved, any address added to the Reply-To field is not really "additional": It does overwrite the ones defined in the identity.
Indeed, open a ticket. The other part of your message is already requested in http://trac.roundcube.net/ticket/1486200.
Am 02.02.2013 13:10, schrieb A.L.E.C:
On 02/02/2013 12:34 AM, Michael Heydekamp wrote:
Unlike to Cc and Bcc, where I can manually add any other addresses while the ones entered in the identity are being preserved, any address added to the Reply-To field is not really "additional": It does overwrite the ones defined in the identity.
Indeed, open a ticket.
Sure, will do later on. (Did really nobody notice that before...?)
The other part of your message is already requested in http://trac.roundcube.net/ticket/1486200.
Yes, for 3 years already. And much to my surprise, it's not even considered as a bug.
But indeed it IS a bug: In the meantime I also encountered that upon saving the message as a draft and continue composing it later on, the following happens:
- The BCC addresses being entered in the identity are still NOT shown in
the respective address field within Roundcube. BUT:
- The Reply-To addresses being entered in the identity ARE all of a sudden
shown in the respective address field within Roundcube.
This different treatment of "Bcc" and "Reply-To" entries in identities can not be meant as being "by design". If so, the design is wrong, IMO.
But this different treatment can at least be used as a workaround: Save the message as draft, close it, edit it again, and THEN you can really add a Reply-To address (by preserving the ones being entered in the identity).
A bit strange, or not...?
Cheers,
Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany
-
A.L.E.C -
Michael Heydekamp