When I reply to mail from the list, field To: is filled with real sender's e-mail, but should be filled with list's e-mail. I think Mailman should add proper Reply-to header. Will someone change that?
A.L.E.C написа:
When I reply to mail from the list, field To: is filled with real sender's e-mail, but should be filled with list's e-mail. I think Mailman should add proper Reply-to header. Will someone change that?
I find this rather usual, other lists I'm subscribed to behave the same way. One clicks "Reply to all" to get his message back to the list, and "Reply" only to contact the sender privately.
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
NetOne - Doichin Dokov wrote:
I find this rather usual, other lists I'm subscribed to behave the same way. One clicks "Reply to all" to get his message back to the list, and "Reply" only to contact the sender privately.
Ok, but when I click "Reply to all" mail is sent to poster AND to the list (To: and Cc:). I'm using two different mailing lists and there is added reply-to header as I like (so I think it's default setting).
A.L.E.C wrote:
NetOne - Doichin Dokov wrote:
I find this rather usual, other lists I'm subscribed to behave the same way. One clicks "Reply to all" to get his message back to the list, and "Reply" only to contact the sender privately.
ok, but when I click "Reply to all" mail is sent to poster AND to the list (To: and Cc:). I'm using two different mailing lists and there is added reply-to header as I like (so I think it's default setting).
I remember talking about this with Jason when the lists changed administrators, he pointed out a few things, amongst them: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
--- 8< --- detachments --- 8< --- The following attachments have been detached and are available for viewing. http://detached.gigo.com/rc/A7/10ia7X7N/signature.asc Only click these links if you trust the sender, as well as this message. --- 8< --- detachments --- 8< ---
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
47E8FA36.3030606@alec.pl 47E956D5.2010208@dragonboricua.net Message-ID: fd0dcc3f0cede465e12aca8b694eba02@unstable.nl X-Sender: andreas@unstable.nl Received: from vpn-144-20.vpn.uva.nl [146.50.144.20] with HTTP/1.1 (POST); Tue, 25 Mar 2008 21:34:32 +0100 User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.1-rc1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:47:33 -0400, Elisamuel Resto samuel@dragonboricua.net wrote:
I remember talking about this with Jason when the lists changed administrators, he pointed out a few things, amongst them: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Note that most "considered harmful" articles are rather tongue-in-cheek in nature.
More seriously, even Roundcube doesn't include such a button to reply to the mailinglist, so not having a reply-to header means that a lot of people have to manually check that mails go to the correct address. Reply-all generates lots of double copies.
I suggest that for pragmatic reasons the reply-to header should be set.
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 21:34:32 +0100, Andreas van Cranenburgh andreas@unstable.nl wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:47:33 -0400, Elisamuel Resto samuel@dragonboricua.net wrote:
I remember talking about this with Jason when the lists changed administrators, he pointed out a few things, amongst them: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Note that most "considered harmful" articles are rather tongue-in-cheek
in
nature.
Yes, the term "considered harmful" is often overused and exaggerated, agreed.
More seriously, even Roundcube doesn't include such a button to reply to the mailinglist, so not having a reply-to header means that a lot of people have to manually check that mails go to the correct address.
Reply-all
generates lots of double copies.
I'm happy with "Reply" and "Reply all" buttons, but wouldn't mind a "List reply" one for detected/supported mailing lists (list-id set or something). If you like the idea really hard you (and the other supporters) could just set the reply-to themself. The list shouldn't mess with it (this is one reason to keep it that way) and your mails "just work" (tm) the way you like it.
I suggest that for pragmatic reasons the reply-to header should be set.
-1 from me. Nothing gained imo, only breaks stuff (like a personal reply..). I'd rather like it to stay the way it is.
Regards, Ben
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Benjamin Podszun ben@galactic-tales.de wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 21:34:32 +0100, Andreas van Cranenburgh andreas@unstable.nl wrote:
I suggest that for pragmatic reasons the reply-to header should be set.
-1 from me. Nothing gained imo, only breaks stuff (like a personal reply..). I'd rather like it to stay the way it is.
-1 as well. It's good as is. Use "reply to all" instead.
Till _______________________________________________ List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
-
A.L.E.C -
Andreas van Cranenburgh -
Benjamin Podszun -
Elisamuel Resto -
NetOne - Doichin Dokov -
till