15 Feb
2007
15 Feb
'07
10:52 a.m.
Are we leaving current sr and rename it to sr_latin, and add the new one as sr_cyrillic or just overwrite the current one?
--
Best regards
Tomasz Pajor
Dnia Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:26:56 +0100 napisales[as]:
> hi all,
> here is Serbian translation. I used existing Serbian as template, and
> modified it, please tell me if I missed something.
> Another thing - Serbian has two scripts - Latin and Cyrillic. Since
> Cyrillic is used everywhere as default (at least in linux
> translations...long story...), this is _real_ sr language. Existing sr
> translation you had was Latin one, and by some convention, it's named
> sr@Latn (at least in gnome/gtk and kde). If it's named only 'sr' that
> means that's Cyrillic by default. So I guess, you should change existing
> sr translation by modifying README and directory structure in it
> appropriately
>
> Greetings, Branko Kokanovic
>
15 Feb
15 Feb
11:17 a.m.
New subject: serbian translation
if you are willing to keep two translations - first one you said (rename sr->sr@Latn/add sr) if you don't want two translations for same language and insist on just one, I think that better will be keeping cyrillic version (overwrite)
Personally, I would like to see both of them, as well as Serbian spoking people, and that would be imho be better for roundcube:/
greetings, branko kokanovic
Tomasz Pajor wrote:
Are we leaving current sr and rename it to sr_latin, and add the new one as sr_cyrillic or just overwrite the current one?
6492
Age (days ago)
6492
Last active (days ago)
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Branko Kokanovic -
Tomasz Pajor